azure active directory - ADAL and MSAL confusion - Stack Overflow Apps using ADAL on existing OS versions will continue to work after this time but will not get any technical support or security updates and this link, using Microsoft IdentityModel Clients ActiveDirectory; ADAL using Microsoft Identity Client; MSAL ADAL should be replaced by MSAL
Authenticate to Azure API App using ADAL - Stack Overflow I have the same issue The use of the ADAL received accessToken always gives me a 403:Forbidden response I've tried both windows console NET client and a Cordova client Both the same result No probs when API App is Public Anonymous but 403 with Public Authenticated Did you make any progress with this issue? –
ADAL: Where do I view the resource IDs? - Stack Overflow I'm new to using adal-node npm package In the example it mentions: var resource = '00000002-0000-0000-c000-000000000000'; Where is this ID from? From my use-case, I just want to batch update users in my AD
Unable to load adalsql. dll error when calling `Invoke-sqlcmd` Well, the installer for the latest version of ADAL (packaged with VS 2019 and the latest version of SQL Server Management Studio) adds a registry entry for the 32-bit version of the DLL (at C:\Windows\SysWOW64\adal dll), but does not add the entry for the 64-bit version (which gets installed to C:\Windows\system32\adal dll) If you build and
Adal. js does not get tokens for external api endpoint resource The problem is that when I set up endpoints while initiating adal js, adal js seems to redirect all outgoing endpoint traffic to microsofts login service Observations: Adal js session storage contains two adal access token key entries One for the client ID of the SPA Azure AD application and one for the external api Only the SPA token has a
adal - Removal of Refresh Tokens - Stack Overflow RT are the logical choice, which seems to be the type of scenario you see described in the other comments here ADAL doesn't address this well today, RT do, and I haven't seen any business justification for removing them - only for keeping them Removing RT would adversely impact about 100+ of our customers using this solution
MSAL ADAL C++ equivalent to get access tokens - Stack Overflow Also regarding the down vote It is unfair It leaves others wondering if there was indeed any research done As a matter of fact I did scour through plenty if github repos and sites to check if there is an "equivalent" SDK that addresses the feature that MSAL ADAL provide I did not find any (not open source ones at-least)