What is a sur-reply? And is it the same as a reply memorandum? The Wiktionary definition of a sur-reply is: An additional reply to a motion filed after the motion has already been fully briefed I do not know under what circumstances a sur-reply would be allowed or considered but I have never had one in my professional career good luck
Sur-Reply - Buchanan PTAB Report The Board indicated that patent owner’s sur-reply was limited to addressing: (1) the alleged new issues raised in petitioner’s reply; and (2) antedating the references cited in petitioner’s reply The Board authorized petitioner to file an opposition to patent owner’s sur-reply Realtime Data LLC v
How can I file a sur-reply? - Legal Answers - Avvo. com Correct If the opposing side's reply is not limited to the response, in violation of Civil Procedure 7 1 (a)(3), or it grossly misstates the record, you may ask for permission to file a sur-reply If the Court is having oral argument, the Judge may say no and you just point out those matters in Court
Under New York law is this a sur-reply? - Legal Answers - Avvo. com Under all circumstances, the adversary must seek court approval to submit a sur-reply which would be granted if your reply included "new" material or arguments Legal Consult Recommended An attorney has indicated that they believe this person will require a legal consultation
In the NJ Family Court, can Defendant reply to the Plaintiffs Reply . . . Mr Warshaw is correct On the other hand, if you are pro se, you could write a letter (it would be called a "sur-reply") and see what happens The judge might consider it, or might refuse to consider it Your first paragraph should start with asking the court to kindly accept the sur-reply and explain why
Missouri Rules concerning: Reply and Sur-reply Memoranda. If a party has filed a sur-reply that is violation of the court's local rules, court Order or the Missouri Rules of Civil Procedure, one solution is filing a Motion to Strike the sur-reply as untimely Generally speaking, however, unless it has prejudiced you in some way, a court will generally permit it, even if filed out of time
Time to sur reply to MSJ - Legal Answers - Avvo. com A sur-reply to an MSJ is only warranted in exceptional circumstances where some new fact occurred or precedent handed down following the filing of your opposition If it's not new, it should have been in your opposition brief, and the court may not appreciate your getting a second bite at the apple, as the expression goes
In California Superior Court what is the ls the last day for filing a . . . (1) It is hardly ever done, so unless you have a really, really good reason, you will just irritate the judge, (2) A sur-reply usually requires permission from the judge hearing the matter (check the local rules), (3) even if your judge agrees (and most will not) most judges don't spend much time on Reply papers, so you can imagine the short
Can a plaintiff respond to the defendants reply memo of law in support . . . If the Reply goes beyond issues raised in the Response, then you should address those issues before the court during oral arguments If the problems with the Reply are egregious, you might be able to draft a Sur-Reply or a counter-affidavit if factual issues are involved and ASK the court for leave to file the Sur-Reply