47 U. S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of . . . section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U S C 230; commonly known as the ‘ Communications Decency Act of 1996 ’) was never intended to provide legal protection to websites that unlawfully promote and facilitate prostitution and websites that facilitate traffickers in advertising the sale of unlawful sex acts with sex trafficking
Section 230: An Overview | Congress. gov | Library of Congress Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, enacted as part of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, provides limited federal immunity to providers and users of interactive computer services
Section 230 - Wikipedia Section 230 protections are not limitless and require providers to remove material that violates federal criminal law, intellectual property law, or human trafficking law
§230. Protection for private blocking and screening of . . . - House Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material The Congress finds the following: (1) The rapidly developing array of Internet and other interactive computer services available to individual Americans represent an extraordinary advance in the availability of educational and informational resources to our citizens
30 Years of Section 230: Why We Still Need It for a Safer Internet Congress passed Section 230 in 1996 to give online platforms the freedom to moderate content in ways that best serve their users Part of the story behind this section of law became a movie starring Leonardo DiCaprio, The Wolf of Wall Street
What Is Section 230? | Section 230 Explained | The Hartford What Is Section 230? Enacted in 1996, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act helps protect online companies from liability arising from what is posted on their platforms Many experts point to Section 230 as a foundational component to how the internet works today
Cruz: Is It Time to Reform Section 230? - commerce. senate. gov Congress included Section 230 to ensure online platforms would not be liable for the illegal speech of another person It did so to preserve a competitive free market, and the text of Section 230 expressly recognized that the Internet provided a ‘forum for a true diversity of political discourse ’