FCC v. Pacifica Foundation - Wikipedia The Supreme Court primarily addressed the matter of whether government regulation of broadcasting content comports with the free speech rights of broadcast operators under the First Amendment [7] The high court ruled 5–4 in favor of the FCC, holding that the Carlin routine was "indecent but not obscene" Therefore, the Commission could not ban such content outright, but it could restrict
Looking back: George Carlin and the Supreme Court Carlin himself wasn’t involved directly in the case, which was called Federal Communications Commission V Pacifica Foundation He had already won a legal verdict in an unrelated case several years prior to the FCC decision when a judge threw out his arrest in for performing the comedy routine at a Milwaukee summer festival
Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation (1978) In FCC v Pacifica Foundation (1978), the Supreme Court reaffirmed that there is less First Amendment protection for broadcast media than other forms of media HOME; George Carlin's "Filthy Words" monologue on an afternoon radio broadcast prompted a father to file a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission, contending minors
{{meta. fullTitle}} - Oyez During a mid-afternoon weekly broadcast, a New York radio station aired George Carlin's monologue, "Filthy Words " Carlin spoke of the words that could not be said on the public airwaves The FCC received a complaint from a man who stated that he had heard the broadcast while driving with his young son Question
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation | Case Brief for Law Students | Casebriefs A satiric humorist named George Carlin (Carlin) recorded a 12-minute monologue entitled “Filthy Words” before a live audience in a California theatre Carlin began by referring to his thoughts about the words that could not be said FCC v Pacifica Foundation Citation 438 U S 726, 98 S Ct 3026, 57 L Ed 2d 1073, 1978 U S 135
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation - Global Freedom of Expression The monologue was recorded from a live performance by satiric humorist George Carlin, who presented his thoughts about “words you couldn’t say on the public airwaves,” which essentially included the use of words depicting sexual or excretory organs and activities and Office of Communication of United Church of Christ v FCC, 359 F
FCC v Pacifica Foundation - University of Missouri–Kansas City FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION v PACIFICA FOUNDATION ET AL SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 438 U S 726 July 3, 1978, Decided Pacifica, in response to an FCC inquiry about its broadcast of Carlin's satire on "'the words you couldn't say on the public airways,'" explained that "Carlin is not mouthing obscenities, he is merely
Obscenity Case Files: FCC v. Pacifica Foundation (George Carlin’s Seven . . . But Carlin’s brush with the law would not compare to what would happen in the next year where his dirty words would begin a path that would take him all the way to the Highest Court in the Land This is the story of FCC v Pacifica Foundation, a landmark decision in the area of free speech law The Pacifica case began simply enough On October