Ex-judges push to look into anti-weaponization fund deal A group of 35 former federal judges asked a court to reopen a legal dispute between President Trump and the government, calling the deal to create a $1 776 billion "anti-weaponization fund
Former judges accuse Trump of deceiving court with fraudulent ‘anti . . . Former judges accuse Trump of deceiving court with fraudulent ‘anti-weaponization’ settlement A settlement was never brought before the court before the president dismissed his suit against the IRS, according to 35 former federal judges
Trump Gets $1. 8 Billion ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ After . . . - HuffPost In exchange for dropping his lawsuit, the Justice Department has agreed to set up a billion-dollar “anti-weaponization fund” to create what the department called “a systematic process to hear and redress claims of others who suffered weaponization and lawfare ”
Trump v. Internal Revenue Service - Wikipedia The Department of Justice (DOJ), which represented the IRS, settled the case out of court in May 2026, and the plaintiffs voluntarily dropped the lawsuit The settlement involved establishing a US$1 776 billion fund for individuals claiming that the DOJ had been weaponized against them
Justice Department Announces Anti-Weaponization Fund They have agreed, in exchange for the creation of this fund, to drop their pending lawsuit with prejudice, and also withdraw two administrative claims including for damages resulting from the unlawful raid of Mar-a-Lago and the Russia-collusion hoax