Corresponds To or Corresponds With - WordReference Forums "Here is how the date of the battle in the Quoxodil calendar corresponds with the Gregorian calendar: Blathmoth 8 corresponds to April 16 " Corresponds with relates to how they correspond Corresponds to implies an identity between the two
it corresponds to do doing something | WordReference Forums this corresponds to changing the direction of the rotation "to correspond to" isn't used with actions The gerund is the noun form of an action, whereas "a change" is the result of an action For example, the following are ok as they are states (results of actions not the actions themselves) this corresponds to a rise in temperature
meaning - Represent vs stand for vs means - English Language . . . Notation A ↔ B stands for that A corresponds to B Qualid and ident stand for qualified identifiers and simple identifiers, respectively In the above example, I used "stand for" twice My friend suggested me to replace the first "stand for" with "represent" Thus, I should use "Notation A ↔ B represents that A corresponds to B"
With who vs. with whom - English Language Usage Stack Exchange Stack Exchange Network Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers
meaning - Corresponding vs. appropriate - English Language Usage . . . As @Rupe said, it sounds like you have fixated on one meaning of the word corresponding When in most cases today the word corresponds denotes a relationship between two things See MW dictionary for the exact definition of how it's being used in your documentation: 2: directly related to something
Undergraduate degree vs Bachelor Degree - WordReference Forums The "Laurea" corresponds to a bachelor's degree while the "Laurea magistrale" corresponds to a master's degree Only the Laurea magistrale grants access to third cycle programmes (Post-MA degrees, doctorates or specializing schools), that last 2 to 5 years (usually completing a PhD takes 3 years)
(s) or s at the end of a word to denote one or many One person's 'good reasoning' can be totally different from another's (including at puplished author level), and here << A compromise outside confines of plain-text is to combine both, "( s)" >> doesn't sit well with <<"(s)" is more correct, because a " " in other uses as grammatical shorthand roles commonly corresponds closely to “or” or
Which is higher — hyper-, ultra- or super-? These are not English words, but Greek (hyper) and Latin (super, ultra) prepositions Hyper and super mean exactly the same thing, 'above' -- they're cognates, in fact; Greek initial S went to H, and Y was the Greek letter corresponding to Latin V (or U)