英文字典中文字典Word104.com



中文字典辭典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z   







請輸入英文單字,中文詞皆可:

DFSG    
請選擇你想看的字典辭典:
單詞字典翻譯
DFSG查看 DFSG 在Google字典中的解釋Google英翻中〔查看〕
DFSG查看 DFSG 在Yahoo字典中的解釋Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕





安裝中文字典英文字典查詢工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
選擇顏色:
輸入中英文單字

































































英文字典中文字典相關資料:
  • What is dfsg in package version numbers? : r debian - Reddit
    What does “dfsg” in the version string mean? “+dfsg N” is a conventional way of extending a version string, when the Debian package's upstream source tarball is actually different from the source released upstream
  • What does dfsg in version-strings mean? : r linux - Reddit
    -dfsg means that the software was modified to comply with the Debian Free Software Guidelines, so yes, your guess is correct It's common enough that things might have to be patched for various reasons when being included in a distro (such as complying with the DFSG), so to keep the original version number but still create a higher version number that will: Be higher than the original number
  • Why did Debian create the DFSG? - Unix Linux Stack Exchange
    The DFSG were first published in the July 1997 announcement of the Debian “Social Contract” It explicitly mentions the ability to redistribute modified source code (or at least “original plus patches”) This was not explicit in the early GNU’s Bulletin definition, though it is related to “modern” freedom three
  • debian - What is the difference between contrib and non-free . . .
    I don't really understand the benefit to either Debian or its users of seperating non-free and contrib What is the actual advantage gained? As an end-user who doesn't care if a program contains non-free code, both non-free and contrib are fine by me As an end-user who does care, both are off-limits for me What is the actual advantage?
  • What does dsfg as a part of package names mean? - Ask Ubuntu
    0 I don't think dsfg is a "typo" I think it's more of a ACRONYM for Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) Just my two cents
  • Preffered way to install Node. js (LTS) on Ubuntu 24. 04
    The apt package manager shows me an older version of Node js: sudo apt list nodejs nodejs noble 18 19 1+dfsg-6ubuntu5 amd6 https: packages ubuntu com noble nodejs So
  • command line - Could not install NTP because of conflicts with time . . .
    I get a problem when install ntp (offline install) because the conflict with time-daemon of systemd-timesyncd # dpkg -i ntp_4 2 8p12+dfsg-3ubuntu4 20 04 1_amd64 deb dpkg: regarding ntp_4 2 8p12+dfsg-
  • Packages containing dfsg in version number are causing issues
    The files removed in these +dfsg packages are: Windows DLLs built-in copies of libraries provided elsewhere (libexpat, libjpeg and the like) editra, which is available in its own package various Flash files some samples from TV shows As such I don't think any of the removals would cause the symptoms you're seeing In any case you can try simply copying the package archives ( deb files) from
  • Unmet dependencies trying to install samba, Ubuntu 22. 04-2
    This is a one week old installation of Ubuntu 22 04 2 I have installed various programs successfully and want to share folders on the local network When I go to this from Files it asks to install
  • Upgrading nodejs on Ubuntu: How to fix broken pipe error?
    The following packages have unmet dependencies: nodejs : Depends: libnode72 (= 12 18 2~dfsg-1ubuntu2) but it is not going to be installed Recommends: nodejs-doc but it is not going to be installed I've also tried running the recommended apt --fix-broken install but it doesn't seem to help





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009

|中文姓名英譯,姓名翻譯 |简体中文英文字典