What does dsfg as a part of package names mean? Stack Exchange Network Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers
debian - What is the difference between contrib and non-free . . . But if it violates DFSG, how can it be in contrib (which is only for DFSG-compliant packages) The condtition it broke: "must not require or recommend a package outside of main for compilation or execution" but by fact, it doesn't require a 'package', and if we say 'any code' instead of package, then it cant be in contrib and should be in non-free
What is dfsg in package version numbers? : r debian - Reddit What does “dfsg” in the version string mean? “+dfsg N” is a conventional way of extending a version string, when the Debian package's upstream source tarball is actually different from the source released upstream
What does dfsg in version-strings mean? : r linux - Reddit -dfsg means that the software was modified to comply with the Debian Free Software Guidelines, so yes, your guess is correct It's common enough that things might have to be patched for various reasons when being included in a distro (such as complying with the DFSG), so to keep the original version number but still create a higher version
Why did Debian create the DFSG? - Unix Linux Stack Exchange The DFSG were first published in the July 1997 announcement of the Debian “Social Contract” It explicitly mentions the ability to redistribute modified source code (or at least “original plus patches”) This was not explicit in the early GNU’s Bulletin definition, though it is related to “modern” freedom three
Unmet dependancies for python3-samba packages on debian 11 (osmc) Stack Exchange Network Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers
What do the different version elements specify in debian package name . . . dfsg does mean that Debian consider this as a real open source free software there is a long explanation here about dfsg This is a classification of open sourceness of the content of Debian (programs, sound and pictures etc ) -1 is Debian's internal numbering system for their modifications to the upstream package (per release)
22. 04 - Unable to link with the right version of libldap - Ask Ubuntu [root@jammy-88: bin]# dpkg -l | grep libldap ii libldap-2 5-0:amd64 2 5 16+dfsg-0ubuntu0 22 04 1 amd64 OpenLDAP libraries ii libldap-common 2 5 16+dfsg-0ubuntu0 22 04 1 all OpenLDAP common files for libraries I don't know where the build is picking up this reference to a 2 4 version of libldap When I try installing my binaries on the target, I
apt - Not Able to Install `libgdal-dev` on Ubuntu 22. 04 Due to Unmet . . . The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libexpat1-dev : Depends: libexpat1 (= 2 4 7-1ubuntu0 2) but 2 4 7-1ubuntu0 3 is to be installed libtiff-dev : Depends: libtiff5 (= 4 3 0-6ubuntu0 7) but 4 3 0-6ubuntu0 9 is to be installed libxml2-dev : Depends: libxml2 (= 2 9 13+dfsg
debian - Whats the difference between `+deb10u1` and `+deb10u2 . . . +dfsg indicates that the upstream source archive was repacked to remove non-DFSG-free content;-separates the upstream part from the Debian part; 3 indicates that this was originally the third iteration of the Debian packaging of 2 4 47+dfsg; +deb10 introduces updates for Debian 10; u1, u2 etc count the updates