Should I always use a comma after e. g. or i. e. ? The use of full stops with eg and ie is certainly not mandatory, as a quick check online will show Cambridge Dictionary and Collins, for instance, list both variants The dropping of full stops seems more prevalent in the UK than in the US; it certainly avoids a lot of clutter (eg i e ,) Rarely does it cause a lack of clarity
Whats the difference between e. g. and ex. ? [closed] E g is short for exempli gratia, and is in common use to introduce an example within a sentence Submit a sample of academic writing, e g , a dissertation chapter However, some authors use ex
abbreviations - Differences between e. g. , viz. and i. e - English . . . You need to use e g in your example because the list is not complete e g exempli gratia - for example i e id est - that is viz videlicet - that is sc scilicet - namely (see viz) In contradistinction to i e and e g , viz is used to indicate a detailed description of something stated before, and when it precedes a list of group members, it implies (near) completeness
英语写作中使用i. e. 和e. g. 时，应该加逗号吗？ - 知乎 然后看Cambridge里， i e Meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary 都没有逗号。然后我在我发表的第一篇文章里统一用的 美音拼写，所以都加上了“，”，然后都被我老师全部给删了，说odd。 所以，应该主流是不加“，”了。 希望对你有帮助！
Is it grammatically incorrect to follow the abbreviations *ie* and *eg . . . It is similarly unnecessary to follow an "eg" list with "etc", as "eg" already implies an incomplete list, and either "eg" or "etc" should be used This blog entry points out a nice distinction between the two: Another thing to pay attention to is whether the list is definite or possible members of a set