Critcher v. LOreal USA, Inc. , No. 19-2474 (2d Cir. 2020) The Food Drug and Cosmetic Act's (FDCA) broad preemption clause, 21 U S C 379s, bars plaintiffs from seeking to impose additional or different labeling requirements through their state-law claims, especially when Congress and the FDA already have provided for specific labeling requirements Plaintiffs filed suit against L’Oréal, alleging common law claims for unjust enrichment and breach
Critcher v. LOréal U. S. , Inc. , 18-cv-5639 (JGK) | Casetext . . . JOHN G KOELTL, District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER JOHN G KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiffs -- Mary Tullie Critcher, Twoana Clark-Sheppard, Victoria Marynovsky, Patrica Belbot, Jessica Petrie, Linda Feiges, Sarah McQueary, and Georgette C Fournier -- are consumers of liquid cosmetics that are marketed and sold by defendant L'Oréal USA, Inc ("L'Oréal")
Critcher v. LOreal USA Inc. | New York Law Journal - Law. com On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York The question presented is whether the state-law claims at issue in this action are completely preempted by