Is Psychology Today a credible source? In this case, the Psychology Today article is a very rare example which is cited and referenced, yet the referenced article does not actually prove their claim, making their article questionable How many other questionable articles are there in Psychology Today?
Are specific brain facts about specific people considered on topic . . . No, there is no policy unique to this kind of question, if I understand what kind of question you're trying to use this as an example of (There is a meta-question about neurobiology questions though: Are questions about neurobiology on or off topic? the question were off-topic for some clear reason that at least five people (or one moderator) would endorse, it could be put on hold for a
Cognitive Science Reboot 2017: Changing the Name - Psychology . . . The name "Cognitive Sciences" can be interpreted to only welcome cognitive science and cognitive psychology, thus excluding, e g , non-cognitive sub-disciplines of psychology We have collected evidence showcasing that psychology and neuroscience is often perceived to be excluded There is a strong majority favoring a name change