meaning - What does referred for mean? - English Language Learners . . . Thus one is often said to have been "referred for" treatment, even when one did not see a different medical person first In fact, that is often called a 'self-referral" In this context, "referred for" basically means "has been given" or "has received"
Which one is correct? as referred by as referred to by Hello Mansoor Neither is correct If you mean Salim "told" you, or "instructed" you to speak to (X) then you might say, "I have been referred to you by Salim" If Salim simply "suggested" you speak to X, or "recommended" you to, then "Salim suggested recommended I get in touch with you " "As referred" is not useful here –
refer to something by or refer to something as The machine selects a single variable X (we refer to the latter by the machine's selected variable) Or The machine selects a single variable X (we refer to the latter as the machine's selected
phrase usage - English Language Learners Stack Exchange Stack Exchange Network Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers
Can defined as and referred to as be used interchangeably? I think this is a question of naming, more than definition, so referred to, or called or even named might fit better For your last sentence, line AB is the name given to the straight line connecting points A and B A definition is more like, A circle is defined as the set of all points equidistant from a single point
Should I use referent or referrer or referee I work on an app, where every user have a unique code, and another person can use that unique code for discounts Is the person applying the code (of another person) referent? Or is the owner of code
word choice - Alice referred Bob (or Carol?) to Carol (or Bob . . . "Hi, Alice referred me to you Hi, I was referred to you by Alice" "Hi, Alice referred you to me Hi, you were referred to me by Alice" i e the ordering of Bob and Carol in the sentence when using "refer" as the verb Please also provide another verb for the other ordering
meaning in context - be considered and be referred to as - English . . . I see nothing particularly "unusual" in never referred to as such here, either But never regarded as such doesn't make sense, because the verbs "consider" and "regard" are effectively synonymous here, so you end up with an utterance basically saying He is X, but he is not X What you think and what you say might be different, but what
grammar - If the we refers to a company, is it is or are . . . Companies are usually referred to in the singular form (eg 'Microsoft Corporation is an American multinational technology corporation') as they are single entities, but spokespersons for companies often use 'we are' in communications, as in your example, when they are talking about the work or values of the many people employed So you could