What does getting scooped mean? - Academia Stack Exchange That would be misconduct and "getting scooped" is really just negative serendipity Suppose two researchers start out trying to answer the same research question, each without knowing of the other person One of them is likely to get a suitable answer first and submits it for publication The other person is said to be "scooped"
publications - Could uploading a paper on arXiv before publishing it in . . . Being scooped (if you post papers before they are accepted for publication) If someone is sitting on similar results, they might finish writing it up quickly and submit it to a journal with a faster peer review process than the one you submitted to Worse yet, the editor and referees might not notice that a similar paper is already on ArXiv
open science - An example of a researcher being scooped as a result . . . By being scooped, I am thinking of a situation where Researcher 1 has made progress on a project openly, but has not yet formally published her or his findings Researcher 2 subsequently takes the informally shared work as a basis for a publication, to the detriment of Researcher 1
preprint - Is there any risk of having my research scooped after . . . Putting immature article before peer review is not proof of discovery If yes, we can easily scoop other's findings by posting quick, short and sloppy article in Preprint server (after knowing their data for example in some research conference)
publications - A poor and mistaken paper scooped a well-written paper . . . As a student, I've read a lot of stories and Stack Exchange threads on scooping, and felt uneasy about it People seem to believe that the first runner gets most of the credit while the group being scooped gets less credits Research also shows that the paper being scooped receives less citations In some scenarios, the scooping group rushed to
How do hiring committees for research positions view getting scooped? Getting scooped will only really reflect badly on you if you could have avoided it, e g by working harder If it happens, and you publish your paper anyway, just a bit later than someone else's, it might be a minor negative when applying for jobs (this one paper of yours had less impact than it might have done), but it's unlikely to be a huge
publications - Proper citation of scooped or defective articles . . . The term "scooped" is usually used to describe the situation where two researchers are simultaneously working on the same thing, and one publishes before the other In this case the other researcher normally finds out as soon the first researcher publishes
Do people actually scoop others? - Academia Stack Exchange Yes people do scoop one another, especially in very competitive fields I have witnessed horror stories of a postdoc sending an advance copy of a paper in final stages of preparation to his former advisor, only to be "scooped" by the advisor who wrote a short comment on the same topic and submitted it to a journal with fast turnaround
How do I address my research publication being scooped? In terms of being scooped, your concern of the other authors having access to your manuscript is a valid one The editor of your manuscript can easily check if one of the reviewers is an author of the competing In the case where the reviewer shared the manuscript with one of the competing authors, things are more difficult to "prove"
What would be a good strategy to avoid being scooped? A few classmates and I are worried about the time lag between submitting a research paper to a conference or journal and the further time lag between rejections and re-submissions during which some