Which preposition is used with accommodating: to for Which is correct? ( The people in the shop, they ) I guess they would be quite accommodating to an American tourist I guess they would be quite accommodating for an American tourist I gues
Accommodate vs accommodate for - English Language Learners Stack Exchange "accommodate vs accommodate for" “Accommodate” without “for” is commonly used Adding “for” specifies a reason behind the accommodation In English, both “accommodate” and “accommodate for” can be correct, but they serve different purposes When you want to talk about making room or adjusting something to fit needs, use “accommodate” alone For example: The hotel can
verbs - Is is accommodated in correct? - English Language Learners . . . Yes, your understanding of accommodate is correct For reference the Merriam Webster dictionary defines as: to provide with something desired, needed, or suited to make room for to hold without crowding or inconvenience accommodated is just the past tense of accommodate, so for example: Today: Can you accommodate me in your hotel? Tomorrow: They accommodated me the the hotel As for your
Can I use accommodating as an opposite of dominating? I'd have to agree with your coworker - 'accomodating' doesn't really seem to be a direct antonym of 'dominating' They might describe two opposite kinds of people, but the specific meanings are not directly antonymic
american english - The confusion about the word accommodation . . . In British English, an accommodation is a state of affairs wherein someone is made comfortable The opposite of a discommodation, which is a much more rarely used word So when used in the sense of a place to stay, accommodation is provided to someone to make them comfortable when away from home A hotel or a friend will accommodate the traveller A hotel can be referred to as providing
A controversial GRE verbal reasoning question I think you can also read 'accepting of' to mean that the actors were very accomodating despite the director's visible boredom Therefore the interpretation here is that saying the actors were merely 'accepting of' is an understatement, because it took a lot of effort for them to suffer his behaviour with a positive attitude