Why does 28 Days Later look so bad : r horror - Reddit Why does 28 Days Later look so bad Movie Help Vhs used to look great in the 90s but if you watch a vhs now it will look like shit Short answer, its a 20 year old low budget film shot on a consumer grade camera Reply reply [deleted] • It's not an amateur film, it was made by Danny Boyle after he was already one of the biggest directing
Why 28 Days Later Looked So Terrible - PetaPixel Adding that 28 Days Later proves that “good cinematography doesn’t always have to look good ” 28 Days Later was filmed ten years before the proliferation of 4K TVs But in spite of all
28 Days Later. . . - Was it a mistake to intentionally film this movie . . . When people ask why the blu-ray copy of this film looks like they're watching a VHS tape on their 4k plasma TV The answer given by the producers of the film is it was intentionally filmed using crappy (as in *beep* cameras to emphasize the fact that it takes place in an urban environment In it, Danny Boyle and the DOP of "28 days later
28 Days Later: 12 things you (probably) didnt know about . . . - Shortlist The unpolished, grainy look of 28 Days Later was because a lot of the movie was shot on MiniDV - the tape of choice for homemade movies back in the late 90s, early '00s Boyle got his cinematographer's to use a Canon XL1 digital video (DV) camera
28 days later was shot with this????? - Cinematography. com Too bad the film looks like absolute garbage They only used digital because they couldn't afford to rent 10 film cameras to do the coverage necessary for the big scenes Seeing 28 Days Later in theaters when it came out, I don't recall thinking anything of the image quality Looking back at it now, yes, the quality is shite, but that may
28 Days Later - Poor video quality? - DVD Talk Forum I just finished watching it (onto 28 Weeks Later now, which looks much better) and couldn't help feeling underwelmed The picture quality didn't have the "vivid crispness" I've gotten used to for HD transfers, and several times it looked like background objects had horizontal lines going through them
Why 28 Days Later = worst film ever made - Straight Dope This thread is dedicated to reasons why “28 Days Later” is possibly the worst film ever made (“Streets of Fire” used to top my worst films list, but we have a new champ, folks ) Only two of the people I watched it with made it to the end, and we survived by keeping track of the absurdities 28DL fans: Please note there are other threads for more general discussion of the film Now, we
28 Days later PQ - Please explain - Blu-ray Forum It's just going to look like something from a video camera rather than film Perhaps the "film makers" just can't accept that In some cases a video look would lend itself to certain stories At first glance there would seem to be little benefit of porting 28 Days Later over to Blu-ray However, consider the nature of the DV and MiniDV
The Untold Truth Of 28 Days Later - Looper Before "28 Days Later," Murphy had mostly done short films, while Harris was known primarily for her work on children's TV shows like "The Tomorrow People " Both actors were relative unknowns, and
Two Reasons Why 28 Days Later Could Never Be Made Today 28 Days Later isn’t your typical run-of-the-mill zombie movie In fact, I think it’s wrong to call it a zombie movie even if the enemy can infect the film’s heroes with a single drop of blood Instead, it’s a virus movie that feels eerily familiar to us now, 20 years later Some of the most famous shots in 28 Days Later are the scenes filmed in the empty London streets