What are binaries? - Software Engineering Stack Exchange The word binaries is used as a set of files which are produced after compiling essentially the object code that runs on machines (and virtual machines runtimes in case of Java NET) (and virtual machines runtimes in case of Java NET)
Compiling vs using pre-built binaries performance? For example, if the binaries offered for download were compiled for debugging (intentionally or by mistake), turning on more aggressive optimization will improve performance in nearly all situations On the other hand, if the compiled code is optimized to the max, you would not see any difference
workflows - Binaries in source control - Software Engineering Stack . . . Checking in build or, worse, runtime binaries into source repositories is just sloppy Git, SVN and the like are, in fact, source control systems There are package management systems for keeping track of required binaries: artifactory, RPM repositories, container repositories, etc
How to organise the correct handling of versions of binaries The question title also mentions "handling versions of binaries" but the question text talks about signing binaries Those are two different things The question title sounds like "dependency management" but signing binaries is more about security than dependency management –
How do you keep released binaries under version control? This systematically ties the released binaries to the repository content without having to actually store the binaries in the repository For example, if you are using SVN, use the branch-major organizational scheme; do all day-to-day development in trunk, and create a tag for each release once it is ready
Why dont some open source libraries provide binaries? A build could be encompass a single binary, or several hundreds of MBs (if not more) in binaries and non-compiled assets (think games) Of course, sometimes nailing down dependencies can be a bit of a pain, but that's up to the author of the package to either provide a list, or a build-time mechanism of downloading building dependencies
git - Best practice for knowing the link between binaries (*. exe and . . . So now I'm thinking of some kind of a release txt file, containing all GIT short SHA for all binaries, but this has the hazard that people might compile on their own PC, copy the binaries onto the customer's system, forgetting about the release txt file and the whole problem persists Is there a best practice for such kind of problem?
licensing - What is stopping people from copy-pasting open-sourced . . . For some licenses you are permitted to release closed source binaries These licenses are known as "permissive" Proponents of these licenses believe that downstream users will contribute back appropriate bug fixes or features because it is a more efficient way of maintaining the code That is the incentive to share is economic and process driven