Whats the difference between the OMF and COFF format? The problem with mixing object files and library files from different compiler vendors is that some vendors support COFF, other vendors use OMF, and a few can handle both Borland, for example, still uses OMF object files and libraries, while Microsoft's 32-bit compilers produce COFF format files
Clarification on Binary file (PE COFF ELF) formats terminology As far as "PE" vs "COFF", my recollection is that Microsoft use the "COFF" specification as the starting point for the "PE" specification but extended it for their needs So strictly speaking a "PE" file isn't a "COFF" file, but it's very similar in many ways
unix - COFF on Linux or ELF on Windows - Stack Overflow Is it possible to run the COFF executable files on UNIX or the ELF executable files on Windows? And what would be the steps to be able to run either file type on Windows and UNIX I'm just curious
Usage differences between. a. out, . ELF, . EXE, and . COFF How is it that Windows and UNIX platform covers both executables annd object code under the same file format ( COFF, elf) Am I misinterpreting "Linkable"? My interpretation of "Linkable" is something that is compiled object code and can then be "linked" to other static dynamic link libraries Is this a stupid thought?
Whats the format of . lib in windows? - Stack Overflow MORE INFORMATION The PE COFF file headers consist of a MS-DOS stub, file signature, COFF Header, and Optional Header An object file contains only the COFF Header, but an image file contains all the headers described above The most important of these headers is the COFF header The table below describes the information stored in the COFF header
LNK2022 and LNK2034 linker errors with version 10. 0 of the CRT I am going to mark this as the answer, because in the link you provided, Mr Lavavej noted that the std::string class is now header only in VC 10 0 and most, if not all, of my linker errors are related to string issues Though I still don't have a resolution to this yet