Expert Opinion under Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - LawBhoomi Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, delineates the admissibility of expert opinions as evidence This provision is pivotal in legal proceedings, especially when the court needs to form an opinion on complex or technical matters beyond the understanding of the average person
Experts Opinion and its admissibility and relevancy - Law of . . . The expert opinion is only corroborative evidence It must not be the sole basis for conclusive proof The expert witness must be subjected to cross-examination in the court Mere submission of opinion by an expert through any certificate or any other document is not sufficient
Expert opinion and its relevancy - Indian Legal Solution The evidence given by experts under 45 is supportive evidence and not the only basis for conclusive proof Section 47 to 50 laid opinion relating to handwriting, the existence of right or custom usages, tenets, and relationships may be admitted in the court of law
Evidentiary Importance of Expert Witness and Opinion The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 allows for the admissibility of expert opinions under certain conditions, and the testimony of experts can significantly influence the outcome of a case by providing insights that laypersons might not possess
Expert Opinion And It’s Relevancy Under The Indian Evidence . . . The expert opinion, related to hand-writing, is definitely relevant but it cannot be treated to be a substantive evidence, and therefore, before proceeding with it, the courts usually look for corroboration, either by direct or circumstantial evidence
Evidentiary Value of Expert Opinion under the Indian Evidence Act The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, provides a structured framework for the admissibility and relevance of expert opinions in legal proceedings This framework is primarily outlined in Sections 45 to 51, which detail the circumstances under which expert opinions can be considered as evidence
Expert Opinion under Indian Evidence Act - Lawctopus State of A P , expert evidence is merely an opinion and not substantive or probative evidence According to procedural rules, expert opinions lack independent value and must be corroborated with circumstantial evidence