Difference between forementioned and aforementioned? I am writing a scientific article, and the reviewer has pointed out that I should check the typo "forementioned", which I use several times in the paper I would like to know, is there any difference between "forementioned" and "aforementioned"?
Is using the term aforementioned sometimes considered bad practice? Bryan Garner, the expert on legal style says this: Aforesaid; aforementioned: These LEGALISMS have little or no justification in modern writing Garner, A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage, p 37 So, if “aforementioned” is considered poor style in legal writing, what about in non-legal writing? Consider the following This morning I saw a dog The aforementioned dog was a beagle Does
Whats the opposite word of aforementioned I am writing a paper and want to use a word which has the opposite meaning of "aforementioned", i e something will be mentioned in following parts
Can aforementioned be used to mean As I mentioned in. . . ? As you said, 'aforementioned' is usually a modifier in itself, and so doesn't take kindly to modifiers used on it "Aforementioned in the introduction " just doesn't make sense It would be better to use 'aforementioned' as an adjective of the idea you are referring to, or, if you don't think your readers will remember that far back, do as you said and say "As stated in the introduction "
grammaticality - The grammar behind above mentioned - English . . . With regard to your friend's original statement, "below-mentioned" is a poor choice because "the issues" have not yet been mentioned In other words, they are still pending statements the below-as-yet-unmentioned issues? "The following issues" is more correct in both grammar and context Or, quite simply, "the below issues" Above-mentioned is indeed a single adjective or adjective phrase