Which one is correct in How can I . . . ? VS How I can . . . How I can I'm answering that way When asking a question, the pronouns should be followed by an (auxiliary) verb So, the structure in general is - What How Which etc + verb + pronoun A simple example is - What can you do for me? If you reverse the order, the phrase remains a sentence and not a question What you can do for me is unknown
Can you please vs. Could you please [duplicate] If taken literally, "Can you" is equivalent to asking the person if they're capable of doing something "Could you", on the other hand, implies that the action can be completed under some circumstances by the person The usage of can you is idiomatic, and hence, is more popular used phrase of the two Using either of them doesn't make them
it is vs it can be - English Language Learners Stack Exchange it struck me that often when we say that something can be interesting we simply mean that it is interesting You can't take modals at "face value" in English all the time Modals are often "misused" by the speaker writer for politeness, often in a professional, business, or legal setting Things possibly "hidden" by modals are: harsh statements
modal verbs - The difference between can be and may be? - English . . . The first thing to say is that the use of modal verbs is a complicated subject, since a given modal verb can have different uses, and different modal verbs may have a similar use The following is based on the advise given in "Science Research Writing for Non-Native Speakers of English" This book lists the following uses for can and may
Starting a question with Could you vs. Can you? "Could" also implies more of a polite request which may be refused, rather than a polite order, although this is a soft implication and does not make "Can" rude I would generally suggest using "Could" although I'd perhaps change the word order as the following flows better and sounds most like a polite request
What is difference between Can, Could, Will, Would, Shall . . . Can could: This works in all senses - for example: “I think I can do it” -> “I thought I could do it”; “I’m told I can have one” -> “I was told I could have one”; “He can’t have eaten it all by now” -> “He couldn’t have eaten it all by then”
meaning - as. . . as it gets Vs. as. . . as can be - English Language . . . As peaceful as any can be has meaning #1 Note that none of these entails a high degree of peacefulness That depends on the contextual frame of reference: you may be speaking of a very peaceful village or of a very agitated village which is less agitated than usual, or of a moderately agitated village in a very agitated universe
Using their or its when referring to an inanimate object The idea is that "its" or "it" refers to something in general or to some non-person, inanimate thing while "their" or "they" refers to people and even pets "Their" and "they" can be used in the third-person singular When used (instead of her or his) to refer to a person, "their" simply includes no information as to their gender:
you can or you could or you may or you might? "He can be alive" (let's be more positive about life) sounds awkward The toss up is between could and might , with may coming in third position With possibility, I often use parking as a scenario: I can could may might park here are all acceptable, but convey subtle differences in meanings
I see or I can see - English Language Learners Stack Exchange Saying "I can see flowers" places the emphasis on the ability to see flowers, perhaps as a product of a particular vantage point, time of day, or other situation, in contrast with a situation in which I cannot see flowers (e g "I can see flowers from the east window" or "I can see flowers when I close my eyes")