What is the difference between infallible and inerrant? As with many others I know, I believe in both the infallibility and inerrancy of the Bible But what is the difference between these two important terms? If something has no errors (inerrant), then
How do Biblical inerrantists explain disagreements about the . . . 12 If God can preserve an inerrant Bible despite the fallibility of the humans who transmitted it, shouldn't He also be able to ensure an inerrant interpretation of that Bible despite human fallibility? Yet, disagreements on interpretation persist among Biblical inerrantists
terminology - From a Fundamentalist standpoint, what does the phrase . . . So, what does the phrase "The Bible is the Inspired, Inerrant Word of God" mean to a Fundamentalist? In simple terms it means God's Word was originally, accurately, and perfectly recorded by the prophets, kings, peasants, fishermen, political leaders, a tax collector, a rabbi, a cupbearer, and ministers that God used
When did the doctrine of biblical inerrancy first emerge after the . . . This led to the formation of The Conference on the Inspiration and Authority of Scripture in 1973 developed by the Ligioner Valley Study Center, subsequently publishing the book God's Inerrant Word, where the presentations were compiled in the form of articles and began with a declaration about the biblical inerrancy
How can a reasonable faith be placed in the Being that inspired the . . . Inerrant: The entirety of Scripture contains 0% errors of any kind If the Bible is not inerrant, i e if it contains errors, and yet is inspired by God does this not mean that the errors are inspired? Not necessarily, the errors might ultimately be traced back to a different cause
denomination survey - How do Christians that do not believe in . . . And do you mean inerrant, or inerrant and literal? Catholics, for instance, teach that scripture is inerrant But, inerrancy does not eliminate the need for educated interpretation Consider that even the bare, literal interpretation of scripture is an application of externally acquired knowledge and skill to a large collections of texts
Is The Bible truly infallible? Is it inerrant without divine . . . Assuming that The Bible cannot be proven infallible, can we at least say it is inerrant? The Bible certainly is proven legitimate with historical evidence and its teachings are proven true in practice This points to the conclusion that it is inerrant, but does it conclusively and certainly prove its inerrancy? Is there any way to show that, without a doubt, The Bible is inerrant?
origin - What is the history of the doctrine of inerrancy . . . Well, I could do some additional research on whether the Catholic version of inerrancy is different from the Protestant version of inerrancy I'd probably also check the history of the doctrine of inerrancy in the Catholic church If the doctrine of inerrancy had been indigenous in the Catholic church, then the first source from Scientific American is just plain wrong