What is more widely used in UK English: -ise or -ize? Additionally, -ise and -ize are pronounced identically, with a voiced sound, so all the matter of s or z is is spelling Noted English authors such as Tolkien used -ize
What is the difference between the suffixes -ize and -ify? The dictionary ascribes the same purpose to both these suffixes: to denote 'to make, or become' However, for some neologisms, -ize seems much more appropriate than -ify does, and vice-versa Th
orthography - English Language Usage Stack Exchange In fact, Canadian, American, and British writers all prefer -ize for recognize, civilize and civilization, organize and organization, realize and realization, and specialize and specialization The British preference for -ise endings is an innovation rather than a longstanding spelling tradition
Newest ise-ize Questions - English Language Usage Stack Exchange The use of -ize and -ise in the UK? [closed] I got a translation assignment where I am to use UK English but with -ize spelling The European Union switched from -ize to -ise some years ago in its English language publications, meaning that -
s vs. z in BE vs. AE - English Language Usage Stack Exchange Hence, some have used the spelling ‑ise in English, as in French, for all these words, and some prefer ‑ise in words formed in French or English from Latin elements, retaining ‑ize for those formed < Greek elements
pronunciation - What will happen if I attach the suffixes -ize and . . . The general guideline I would give is that ŋɡ is unlikely with new formations, especially if the word is a "nonce formation" of the kind that is often hyphenated: if a spelling like "anything-ize" or "anything-ify" seems possible, then the pronunciation will likely not have g