Starbucks Cancer Lawsuit The Council for Education and Research on Toxics sued around 90 coffee retailers, including Starbucks, on grounds that they had failed to warn consumers of potentially cancer-causing chemicals in their products
New cancer warning labels in Starbucks Dunkin’ Donuts - FADIC The ruling arises from a lawsuit filed in 2010 by the council for Education In addition to Research on Toxics – nonprofit group The group complains that Starbucks Dunkin’ Donuts and the other 91 defendants didn’t warn customers that drinking coffee would expose them to Acrylamide
Starbucks Consumer Class Action | Hagens Berman The lawsuit alleges that Starbucks’ claims of their coffee consisting of only “100% Arabica coffee” are misleading consumers who may actually be exposed to unexpected chemicals
Coffee Defendants Victorious in Proposition 65 Appeal After the coffee-related regulation was adopted and coffee was exempted from Proposition 65’s cancer warning requirement, the lawsuit’s defendants raised the new regulation as an affirmative defense to the plaintiff’s claim and filed a motion for summary judgment
Cancer Warnings at Calif. Starbucks? Judges Final Ruling Clears the . . . A nonprofit group sued about 90 coffee companies, including Keurig Green Mountain Inc and Peet’s Operating Co Inc , under a state law that requires warnings on products and in places where chemicals that can cause cancer are present
California judge rules that coffee requires cancer warning The suit was brought against Starbucks and 90 companies under a law passed by California voters in 1986 that has been credited with culling cancer-causing chemicals from myriad products and also criticized for leading to quick settlement shakedowns