安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- HTTP Status code 202 vs 200 for a POST request - Stack Overflow
I have confusion that, Im using 202 status code, when I receive a POST request from a client (A) and B is processing it , passing the output to another endpoint(C) In this case I use 202 status code
- Use http status 202 for asynchronous operations - Stack Overflow
49 I think that your solution is fine, the Http status 202 is the proper response to use in this specific case indicating that the request has been accepted for processing, but the processing has not been completed What I would slightly change in your workflow are the Http status of the subsequent requests
- Is it wrong to return 202 Accepted in response to HTTP GET?
Otherwise, a 202 "Accepted" status code is returned, and the client must poll the resource until the final representation is available The reason for this behavior is the following: If a result is available within a few seconds, it needs to be retrieved as soon as possible; otherwise, when it becomes available is not important
- HTTP Status 202 - how to provide information about async request . . .
What is the appropriate way of giving an estimate for request completion when the server returns a 202 - Accepted status code for asynchronous requests? From the HTTP spec (italics added by me): 202
- python - HTTP status code 200 vs 202 - Stack Overflow
The 202 response is intentionally non-committal Its purpose is to allow a server to accept a request for some other process (perhaps a batch-oriented process that is only run once per day) without requiring that the user agent's connection to the server persist until the process is completed
- return value - REST API 202 versus 204 - Stack Overflow
I'm dealing with a REST API and have this question, when a request is scheduled for further processing we should return 202, when a request has no response body we should return 204 What should we
- Is the use of Location header in HTTP 202 response RFC-compliant?
Return HTTP status code 202 (Accepted) to indicate the request was accepted for processing but is not completed You should expose an endpoint that returns the status of an asynchronous request, so the client can monitor the status by polling the status endpoint Include the URI of the status endpoint in the Location header of the 202 response
- Android Webview error - chromium handshake failed; returned -1, SSL . . .
Android Webview error - chromium handshake failed; returned -1, SSL error code 1, net_error -202 Asked 1 year, 4 months ago Modified 1 year, 4 months ago Viewed 1k times
|
|
|