安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- Case Documents - Supreme Court of the United States
The docket also includes links to electronic images of most filings submitted to the court after November 13, 2017 To locate the docket for a particular case through a docket search, enter either the docket number for the case (e g , 16-1523), or the names of one or more parties, or attorneys in the case
- How to Write a Successful Cert Petition - National Association of . . .
The Justices and their clerks don’t receive the cert ilings seriatim, i e , as they are iled Rather, the Clerk’s ofice holds onto the submissions, giving the petitioner two weeks after the brief in opposition is iled to ile its reply The Clerk’s ofice then delivers the entire batch of documents—petition,
- No. 18-1086 In the Supreme Court of the United States
that if the defendant neglects to set up the defense, the defendant is precluded as to its existence by the judg-ment rendered in the action ” 46 Am Jur 2d Judg-ments § 481 (Am Jur ) (collecting cases) Accord, e g , 18 Federal Practice Procedure Jurisdiction § 4414 (3d ed 2019 update) (FP P) These authorities thus
- STATE OF LOUISIANA v. DONALD S. WRIGHT - Justia Law
Defendant now appeals his conviction and sentence, raising 46 assignments of error, variously combined into 21 arguments 1 Facts At approximately 4:00 or 5:00 p m on December 12, 1999, defendant, his livein girlfriend, Lora Moseley, and Moseley's six-year-old daughter, Heather White, went to the Dairy Queen on Pines Road in Shreveport
- Federal Litigation: Evasive Opponents and Rule 36 (a) (6) Motion . . .
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are clear, “unless the party securing an admission can depend on its binding effect, he or she cannot safely avoid the expense of preparing to prove the very matters on which he or she has secured the admission, and the purpose of the rule is defeated ” 4 Remember that “Rule 36 ‘is not a discovery
- G. R. No. 241890 - The Lawphil Project
The records bear out that only Esmeraldo Manansala (Esmeraldo), attorney-in-fact of respondent Avelino Manansala (Avelino), was presented as witness before the RTC and who testified that: he is the son of Avelino; his father is the only heir of the late Fel M Manansala (Fel), who died on June 25, 1997, and left behind two parcels of land
- G. R. No. 196359 - Supreme Court E-Library
Rosanna insisted on living with her parents despite having her own family, resulting in her parents constantly intruding into their marital life [119] As to the parcel of land allegedly donated by Rita M Tan, Mario claimed that the donation was a "manipulative device" to make it appear that Rosanna exclusively owned the lot
- HOW TO DRAFT GOOD FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Ikard Law
HOW TO DRAFT GOOD FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW LAURIE RATLIFF IKARD GOLDEN JONES, P C 400 West 15th Street, Suite 975 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 472-4601
|
|
|