安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- authentication - Why is Bearer required before the token in . . .
What exactly is the difference between following two headers: Authorization : Bearer cn389ncoiwuencr vs Authorization : cn389ncoiwuencr All the sources which I have gone through, sets
- oauth - JWT-bearer grant with JWT assertion vs. client credentials . . .
Note that the JWT bearer token doesn't contain the client credentials and may have to be combined with client authentication For example, in the Microsoft On-Behalf-Of flow, the authorization server expects both a JWT bearer token as part of the grant and client credentials for authentication (either a shared secret or another JWT bearer token)
- Do I need CSRF token if Im using Bearer JWT?
Bearer tokens, or other HTTP header based tokens that need to be added manually, would prevent you from CSRF Of course, but sort of off-topic, if you have a XSS vulnerability, an attacker could still access these tokens, but then it doesn't become a CSRF bug
- CORS request is not sending Authorization: Bearer lt;value gt; header
Bearer tokens are not sent automatically They must be manually added by the client on every request As such, any site that uses bearer tokens as its only form of session authentication is automatically secure against CSRF and CORS misconfiguration, as the attacker will never know the value to send in the Authorization header (or, if the attacker does know, then they can just send the request
- OIDC with JWT in HTTP-only cookie instead of HTTP Authorization bearer . . .
I'm exploring the possibility of implementing OpenID Connect (OIDC) with an HTTP-only cookie to keep my frontend code completely authentication-agnostic, instead of passing the Authorization header
- Storing bearer token in cookie for file retrieval in another tab
The existing system involves storing the bearer token in a cookie to fulfill a customer request of not only downloading an attachment within the application but also opening it in another tab This
- oauth - How is pop token more secure than bearer token? - Information . . .
Bearer token if lost (during transit over the wire) can give the holder of the token same privileges as the genuine owner POP token is supposed to additional security by making sure that it has a component that is known only to the genuine owner
- What are the alternatives for a bearer token mechanism?
Who gets a bearer token, will have all the privileges of the actual owner of the token Is there any tokening mechanism which is not suffering from this issue?
|
|
|