英文字典中文字典Word104.com



中文字典辭典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z   


安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!

安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!








  • Bismarck at DS after the second turn - Page 16 - Naval History Forums
    Re: Bismarck at DS after the second turn by Antonio Bonomi » Wed Dec 12, 2018 4:17 am
  • Bismarck construction flaws - Naval History Forums
    Bismarck construction flaws by Monitor » Fri May 13, 2005 5:50 pm This subject is often discussed in military and naval circles Can somebody enumerate Bismarck construction flaws and their possible impact on the ship's final demise?
  • Bismarck range - Naval History Forums
    Bismarck´s steam plant was a high temperature high pressure on, at 58 kg cm2, while the American´s was a little lower at 40 kg cm2 Bismarck´s steam would attain a higher steam jet velocity, what would need a matching high rpm turbine for efficiency, which Bismarck´s single reduction gearing could not reach
  • Sink the Bismarck (1960) - Page 2 - Naval History Forums
    Lest we forget, Sink the Bismarck was based on the 1959 historical novel Hunting the Bismarck by C S Forester Forester made no pretense about it being anything more than a novel
  • Bismarck and her contemporaries - Page 49 - Naval History Forums
    Re: Bismarck and her contemporaries by Bgile » Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:50 pm There seems to always be a significant number of duds when heavy armor is encountered However, a dud can sometimes be even more damaging than a bullet which explodes For example, suppose a shell failed to explode and instead was deflected through the bottom of the ship?
  • Bismarck analysis - Page 3 - Naval History Forums
    Bismarck straddled Rodney at 3rd salvo, around 8:51, causing minor splinter damage, followed by an immediate course alteration performed by Rodney (slightly to the N-E), and by KGV (slightly to the S-E)
  • Bismarck and Titanic - Naval History Forums
    Also Bismarck´s difference between standard and full displacement was of just 9,200 tons (22% of her standard displacement) while Titanic´s was of 21,428 tons (86% !!!!) It´s almost twice her own displacement What´s that due for: the coal?
  • Further expeditions to the Bismarck - Naval History Forums
    Further expeditions to the Bismarck by 30knots » Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:53 pm Does anyone know if it is planned to have any further expeditions to the Bismarck wreck ? I see from info posted on the previous expeditions that there is still an 'unexplored debris field' ? Thanks for any replies


















中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009

|中文姓名英譯,姓名翻譯 |简体中文英文字典