安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- Correspond to vs. Correspond with - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
Is there any significant difference between Correspond to and Correspond with? I only mean in the sense of "matching", here, rather than "communication" I've looked at a few sources, but I can't
- meaning - Corresponding vs. appropriate - English Language Usage . . .
I would suggest looking up the word "correspond" in a dictionary to start with It has another meaning which has nothing to do with letter-writing "Corresponding" is a more specific relationship than "appropriateness", and so could be a better choice in your cases
- Why does the letter a correspond to ɪ in words like image . . .
6 In American English, in words ending with -age, -ate and -ace, the ‹a› correspond to ɪ (short i) Examples: image, village, damage private, senate, separate surface, preface, palace (It should be noted that dictionaries do not always agree about the pronunciation, and some use ə instead of ɪ for some of the words)
- differences - identical with vs. identical to - English Language . . .
I find myself always wondering which is the grammatically correct expression or, provided that both are correct, whether there are differences between their meaning One example: Passage A in thi
- phrase requests - Is there a word expression that would correspond to . . .
Is there a word expression that would correspond to something like "self-distance"? Ask Question Asked 12 years, 7 months ago Modified 9 years, 4 months ago
- Difference between full professional proficiency and native or . . .
In practical and conventional terms, anything beyond Limited Working Proficiency requires fluency in all the categories Reading, Writing Speaking In order of proficiency, 'Native' ranks on par with or above 'Professional' I presume you are not a native speaker Depending on what you think is the extent to which others can understand when you speak, you may state either Working or
- Why is that in the relative clause not a complementizer?
The equivalent of a complementiser in grammars such as CGEL is a subordinator, and that's exactly the category that CGEL assign to relative that Relative that is also a complementiser in many other grammars, too However, there are a wide range of different analyses out there In the other answers here, you'll find lots of arguments about why relative that should be regarded as a pronoun or
- Difference in meaning between did you speak to. . . and have you spoken . . .
Possible Duplicate: How do the tenses in English correspond temporally to one another? What's the difference in meaning between "Did you speak to the landlord this morning?" and "Have you spoke
|
|
|