安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- classless and classful addressing - Cisco Learning Network
Classful means: class A,B, and C then the mask 8, 16 and 24 respectively there is no subnet Then on classless you can barrow bits from host to become a subnet Expand Post
- confused - classful addressing and classless addressing
Hi All, Im a bit confused as to the difference between classless and classful addressing, I understand that classful has 3 parts network, subnet and host, which means a class A B or C network that can be subnetted such as 192 168 5 0 26 (a class C network that has been subnetted)
- Cisco Learning Network
Sorry to interrupt Cancel and close This page has an error You might just need to refresh it First, would you give us some details?
- Cisco Learning Network
You have no "classful" network to be redistributed The 172 16 100 0 24 is not "classful", therefore no route is redistributed Even if you add the static route With the static route you will need to use "redistribute static" command rather than "redistribute connected" So your options: (1) redistribute connected subnets
- Classful Routing Protocols VLSM problems - Cisco Learning Network
Classful routing protocols having simpler routing updates because the subnet mask is not sent in the update It can instead be determined using the first octet to determine the class of the address and from there it knows the default subnet mask That part makes sense but what is confusing me is when you filter in subnetting
- Cisco Learning Network
Loading ×Sorry to interrupt CSS Error
- Classful vs Classless - Cisco Learning Network
Hi All, Can you please clarify the following:-10 0 0 0 8 -- Class A and classful > 10 1 0 0 24 -- Class A and classful or classless ? 172 16 0 0 16 -- Class B and classful > 172
- Re:Classful protocol nature - Cisco Learning Network
You use no auto-summary to disable auto summarization between classful network boundaries That is not the same as it being a classful routing protocol EIGRP itself is still a classless routing protocol 192 168 100 x as posed in your diagram is still the same class of network There is no class boundary
|
|
|