安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- Mohori Bibee vs Dharmodas Ghose - LawBhoomi
The appellant in Mohori Bibee vs Dharmodas Ghose argues that the respondent must repay the amount advanced to him in accordance with Section 64 and Section 38 of the Indian Contract Act (1872) and Section 41 of the Specific Relief Act (1877)
- Mohori Bibi vs Dharmodas Ghose Case Summary (1903 PC)
Mohori Bibi vs Dharmodas Ghose case gave the well-defined principle that any contract entered by a minor is void ab initio and doctrine of restitution turns out to be unenforceable in such circumstances
- Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903) 30 I. A. 114 - Drishti Judiciary
It is a landmark case that deals with the concept of minor’s agreement that is void ab initio which means void since the very beginning Dharmodas Ghose, a minor, mortgaged his property to secure a loan from his uncle, Brahmo Dutt The mortgage was later sold to the plaintiff, Mohori Bibee
- Case Analysis-Mohori Bibee v s dharmodas Ghose - Legal Service India
In the case of Mohori Bibee V S Dharmodas Ghose, the Privy Council strictly defined that any sought of contract or agreement with a minor[8]or with any infant shall be null and void All contacts with the minors will be void ab-initio
- Case Summary: Mohori Bibee vs Dharmodas Ghose - LawLex. Org
In Mohori Bibee v s Dharmodas Ghose, at the end it can be concluded that any agreement or deed in which minor is party to it or is included in such agreement shall be declared null and void because such agreement is not agreement in the eyes of law
- Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose - Wikipedia
Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose, [1903] UKPC 12, is a major Indian contract law case decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council The case held that a contract entered into by a minor is totally void
- Landmark judgments on contract with a minor - iPleaders
It is stated under THE MAJORITY ACT OF 1875 a person of either sex who is under the age of 18 (Eighteen) is to be considered a minor Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghosh In this case, the privy council held that a contract by a minor is void-ab-initio (from the start) it was held in 1903
- CASE ANALYSIS: MOHORI BIBEE V DHARMODAS GHOSE - IJIRL
Dharmodas Ghose is the plaintiff and Mohori Bibee is the defendant but she is the executive and legal representor of Brahmo Dutt The plaintiff is a minor and if he enters any contact so it will be void ab initio but he enters in a contract by misrepresenting his age and him being a major
|
|
|