安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- grammar - why we need dummy subjects and its usage? - English Language . . .
Here is my question If something exists in some place then we use adverbs of place So adverbs can fulfill the use of existence or presence of something Then why we need dummy subjects and its usage?
- word meaning - Difference between idiot and dummy? - English . . .
Although idiot and dummy do commonly have the same meaning, the use of idiot in this joking phrase draws particular attention to a specific sense of idiot From Merriam-Webster's definition of idiot: 1 : a foolish or stupid person It's the use of foolish in the definition that's relevant From Merriam-Webster's definition of dummy: 1 c : a
- grammar - Can the word THIS be a dummy subject? For example: This is . . .
5 I think the "dummy subject"you are talking about is that which is known as an expletive subject A good example is It is raining In the text you quote I don't believe this is used in quite the same way Even though there is no this at whom one could point, it could refer to a person named in the letter from David Hutton
- dummy pronouns - How many meters is it are there is there between . . .
Which one is correct? 1 How many meters is it between this tree and that car? 2 How many meters is there between this tree and that car? 3 How many meters are there between this tree and that car?
- pronouns - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
It's an anticipatory "it", as "it" could be replaced with "you joining us" It's not a dummy as it does actually refer to something specific The second is the same, although calling it anticipatory seems a bit odd Both could be rewritten as "You joining us would be awesome" By the way, "would" is better than "will" in both cases "Will" sounds wrong with "if"
- It must have been a powerful wizard to . . . -- is it a pronoun or a . . .
This is, as you suspected, a "dummy" pronoun The English verb BE is not 'existential' - that is, it cannot be used intransitively to assert the existence or occurrence of its subject It is a copula which joins its subject to a noun or adjective phrase which characterizes the subject - a 'subject complement' Consequently, if you want to assert the existence of something you must introduce a
- There is some or There are some- which is correct?
Initial There's is OK before anything When it's at the beginning of the sentence, it's just a dummy, with no meaning or plural, and it's reified into one word before anything plural can happen in the sentence By the time the real subject comes along, plural or not, the listener will've forgotten how the sentence started Since it didn't start with anything meaningful except the dummy
- Using they in tag questions with everybody nobody etc
In English, existential clauses usually use the dummy subject construction (also known as expletive) with there, as in "There are boys in the yard"… In the OP's sentence, the subject is not "nobody" but there (is) Consequently, the rule dictates that you should repeat the same subject used in the clause to make a question tag
|
|
|