安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- September 2024 Policy Brief - DiVA
No-take zones can be an effective tool for protecting fish accept seasonal spawning closures than no-take-zones A study in the Stockholm archipelago of 11 areas closed for fishing of no-take zones on fisheries in the short term is more difficult to assess However, one possible positive effect is that more and larger
- Establish no-take zones to protect stocks and ecosystems
It is generally much easier to get fisher and fishing right holders to accept seasonal spawning closures than no-take-zones A study in the Stockholm archipelago of 11 areas closed for fishing during the spawning season for more than 10 years showed that the number of pike caught per fishing effort (with a fishing rod) was significantly higher
- Closing certain essential fish habitats to fishing could be a win-win . . .
The closures can be broadly classified according to their duration (seasonal or permanent), size (large vs small) and the level of fishing restriction (no-take or partial-take) For example, at the most protective end of the spectrum are the permanent no-take closures where marine areas are permanently closed for all kinds of fishing activities
- Trade-offs between spatial temporal closures and effort reduction . . .
As part of the Multi annual northwestern Mediterranean demersal fisheries management plan enacted in 2020, two large seasonal closures were added to further reduce catches of juvenile hake The Northward expansion of the FRA was applied from November to April in addition to closure of the 90-100 m isobaths from September to April
- Benefits and costs of two temporary no-take zones
Temporary or periodic NTZs have a long tradition and are implemented widely as a fisheries management tool, and compared to permanent closures a major benefit is that they maintain the local community's access to the marine resources [18] Modelling studies have indicated that they may provide benefits under some circumstances [34] However, considering both socioeconomic and biological factors
- Conservation for sustaining livelihoods: Adaptive co-management of fish . . .
Inland capture fisheries provide opportunities to demonstrate an integration of conservation and livelihood objectives when managed as a social-ecological system While numerous marine no-take reserves have been found effective for the recovery of fisheries, few well-documented examples exist in the freshwater realm
- Assessment of fish communities in a Mediterranean MPA: Can a seasonal . . .
The efficacy of a Mediterranean Marine Protected Area (National Marine Park of Zakynthos – NMPZ, Ionian Sea, Greece) that implements a seasonal no-take zone as part of its management scheme was assessed using fish data collected in situ with underwater visual census Sampling was conducted at two habitat types (Posidonia oceanica meadows and rocky reefs) that occur at sites of different
- Benefits and costs of two temporary no-take zones
Temporary no-take zones (NTZs) are increasingly introduced in Sweden as a fisheries management tool to restore populations of specific target species This paper presents a cost-benefit analysis of two real case temporary NTZs closed during a 5–6 year period in the coastal zone of the Baltic Sea , using scenario analysis to account for
|
|
|