安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- difference - has vs has been or have vs have been - English . . .
The cake has been eaten (by Mary) The report has been finished (by me) My phone has been taken (by someone) Your second sentence fits in here: The file has been deleted (by somebody) We use the passive like this when we want to shift the focus of the sentence away from the doer of the action
- Which is the correct question (Who has vs Who have)?
EDITED: As a commenter has mentioned, there are also echo questions, where the "who" question can easily use a plural verb For example: For example: A: "That gorgeous blonde girl that just moved in across the street, and the redhead that you're too shy to talk to, and also that girl who's always trying to beat you up on the playground, they
- When to use is and has - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
Tea is come or Tea has come; Lunch is ready or Lunch has ready; He is come back or He has come back; She is assigned for work or She has assigned for work; Actually these were the sentences that I came across in the last few days, and everybody uses 'is' but I think 'has' is correct, so I'm just confused about how to differentiate 'is' and 'has'
- questions - What Has or What Have, and Why? - English Language . . .
"Has" in the second sentence refers to the period of time which is described by the weeks, even though the sentence doesn't directly mention time Since it is a singular period of time (covering weeks), we use the singular "has" instead of the plural "have"
- Its done. or Its been done. - English Language Learners Stack . . .
It has been done is used when you want to use the passive voice instead of active voice in the sentence Here time reference is not required Example: Manager asks - Did you complete the report? You - Yes, It has been done Both are correct Coming to your case If you have just finished your work, you can say: Okay! It's done
- difference - Have been doing and have done - English Language . . .
This gives us the reading that the activity has been going on for five years up until now It also implies that the activity will keep continuing, at least in the immediate future (2) I have played tennis for five years The tense is the simple perfect tense The time phrase is, again, for five years However, the sentence is different from (1)
- Difference between has to be, was to be, had to be, and should be
This exercise has to be carried out in three months This MUST be completed There is a deadline with NO EXCEPTIONS! This exercise should be carried out in three months There is REASON TO BELIEVE this will be completed This exercise was to be carried out in three months This is NO LONGER NECCESSARY to complete
- Had vs. had been - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
The key is that the sentence with elected is using the passive construction, but the sentence with remained has an active construction As Dave Sperling says on his ESL website : Because subjects of passive verbs receive the action, verbs that cannot have objects (intransitive verbs) do not have passive forms
|
|
|