安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- 学术期刊图片中的 figure key ,legend, caption 这三者有啥区别啊？ - 知乎
论文各部分内容的作用不同，它们各司其职，从不同角度呈现研究。但同时，又有不少概念让作者们感觉困惑，比如：Abstract 和 Introduction 有何区别？figure captions，labels 以及 legends 是同一个概念吗？ Figure captions, lables 和 legends 之区别 The Results section of a manuscript includes tables, figures, and other non-textual
- Is it acceptable to start a sentence with “however”?
I think this is a question of elegance, rather than correctness Starting a sentence with "however" works fine - but in every case I've encountered, putting it in the middle adds punch Take the example from Edward Tanguay's answer, "However, I don't give a damn" and rephrase it to "I do not, however, give a damn " That sounds a lot more interesting to my ears
- 如何制作一张好的学术海报（poster）？ - 知乎
如何获得我的获奖海报模板？ 获取方式 在公众号「密斯特杨」内发送「学术海报」即可获得我的三版模板。 制作一张好的学术海报并不容易。 制作学术海报很简单，将论文中的重要句子和段落复制到ppt上，图片插入到段落中，稍加排版配色就能完成一张学术海报。或者在网上找个现成的模板，再
- prepositions - Is there a difference between “introduction to” and . . .
0 “Introduction to” seems to be much more common than “introduction into”, but is the latter an acceptable alternative? If it is, is there some difference in meaning, tone, or connotations? I was inclined into thinking that “into” suggests a deeper introduction, going deep inside the topic, but is it just me?
- 现在很多sci的期刊都需要Graphical Abstract，如何制作？ - 知乎
前几天刚画了一副，真是这年头别管IF高低，都可能会被要求上传图形摘要and它的说明（Short Abstract）。 另外目前也有一些杂志允许从结果figure中选择一个有代表意义的，这个时候可以简单的选一个最能代表课题重点的图即可，这种一般不要求配它的说明。 格式要求不需要说了，杂志投稿须知里都有
- difference between introduction to or introduction of
An introduction of historians (the people about to come on stage or in your story) An introduction to historians (the audience, or something you will make place for)
- 如何写好SCI论文中的Conclusion？ - 知乎
引言（Introduction）写作技巧： 怎样写好英文论文的 Introduction 部分？ 材料与方法（Materials and Methods）写作技巧： 如何写好SCI论文中的Materials and Methods（材料与方法）？
- I myself Naresh as an introduction - English Language Usage Stack . . .
OK, substitute ‘as well as’ McArthur’s point is similar to that in ‘Linguistics: An Introduction’ by Radford and others: ‘Sociolinguistic research has demonstrated that the speech of most people is, at least in some respects, variable, combining, for example, both standard and non-standard sounds, words or grammatical structures ’
|
|
|