Difference between static linking and dynamic linking The is a disadvantage of static linking and advantage of dynamic linking Only one copy of a shared library resides in memory for dynamically-linked executables If several processes call the same object module of a shared library simultaneously, they all use the same copy of the library
c++ - Static linking vs dynamic linking - Stack Overflow Static linking vs Dynamic linking Static linking is a process at compile time when a linked content is copied into the primary binary and becomes a single binary Cons: compile time is longer; output binary is bigger; Dynamic linking is a process at runtime when a linked content is loaded This technique allows to:
CMake linking error (undefined reference to) - Stack Overflow It could well be the linking order It looks like messages_robocup_ssl_wrapper pb depends on messages_robocup_ssl_geometry pb If so, wrapper should come before geometry in the link line
c++ - How to properly link libraries with cmake? - Stack Overflow Let me try to explain how linking works in CMake The idea is that you build modules in CMake, and link them together Let's ignore header files for now, as they can be all included in your source files Say you have file1 cpp, file2 cpp, main cpp You add them to your project with: ADD_LIBRARY(LibsModule file1 cpp file2 cpp )
Telling gcc directly to link a library statically After all I'm telling gcc directly all other information about linking with libraries (-Ldir, -llibname) Is it possible to tell the gcc driver directly which libraries should be linked statically? Clarification: I know that if a certain library exists only in static versions it'll use it without -Wl,-Bstatic , but I want to imply gcc to prefer