安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- Opinion | Why Israel Had to Act - The New York Times
The Oct 7 Hamas attack on Israel showed the need for Israel to pre-empt threats against it rather than react defensively Why Israel Had to Act June 21, 2025, 7:00 a m ET Credit
- AIPAC - Why Israel Had to Act
Israel estimates that Iran had plans to produce 300 missiles per month, in an effort to build an arsenal of close to 20,000 missiles in the coming years By achieving this arsenal, Iran could have easily overwhelmed Israel’s air defense systems — causing catastrophic damage far beyond what it has been able to achieve in the current fighting
- Why Israel will always act alone when needed to defend itself
That Israel acted Friday morning, sending over 200 planes to carry out an attack that was meticulously planned months, and even years, in advance, is an indicator that it felt it had no choice
- Webster contends Israel had to act to stop Iran from . . .
Congressman Daniel Webster said Israel had to take action to stop Iran from completing work on a nuclear weapon Israel shocked the world by striking Iranian nuclear facilities and missile factories and killing Iranian military commanders in an attempt to stop Iran from building an atomic weapon
- The War Israel Was Ready to Fight
Within months, Israel and Lebanon had agreed to a cease-fire, and Hezbollah was effectively disabled Israel did the heavy lifting, and the U S acted as the closer with its diplomacy
- Ex-CIA analyst Fleitz: Iran was months from a nuke, Israel . . .
Former CIA analyst and America First Policy Institute Vice Chair Fred Fleitz said Friday he believed Iran was months away from a nuclear weapon and that Israel had to act to prevent that development Israel launched a "pre-emptive" strike on Iran from Thursday evening into Friday morning, aiming to dismantle the country's nuclear program
- Can Israel still claim self-defence to justify its Gaza war?
At the start of the war, many nations agreed Israel had a right to defend itself, but how it did so mattered Israel is indeed continuing to act as an occupying power, even though it has not
|
|
|