安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- What is the Difference Between Mercurial and Git?
The Bookmarks extension for Mercurial adds local names, and with Mercurial 1 6, you can move these bookmarks around when you push pull I use Linux, but apparently TortoiseHg is faster and better than the Git equivalent on Windows (due to better usage of the poor Windows filesystem)
- Mercurial for Beginners: The Definitive Practical Guide
Inspired by Git for beginners: The definitive practical guide This is a compilation of information on using Mercurial for beginners for practical use Beginner - a programmer who has touched sou
- Git vs Mercurial vs SVN - Stack Overflow
SVN is different from Git and Mercurial, in that it is a single repository that all users have to pull and commit to Git and Mercurial have a distributed model This means that there is a repository on every computer and there is usually an "Official" repository that people will choose to commit their changes to and pull from Git and Mercurial are extremely similar I prefer Mercurial
- Git and Mercurial - Compare and Contrast - Stack Overflow
Mercurial uses rename tracking, while Git uses rename detection to deal with file renames Network: Mercurial supports SSH and HTTP "smart" protocols, and static HTTP protocol; modern Git supports SSH, HTTP and GIT "smart" protocols, and HTTP (S) "dumb" protocol Both have support for bundles files for off-line transport
- What are the relative strengths and weaknesses of Git, Mercurial, and . . .
16 What do folks here see as the relative strengths and weaknesses of Git, Mercurial, and Bazaar? In my opinion Git strength is its clean underlying design and very rich set of features It also has I think the best support for multi-branch repositories and managing branch-heavy workflows It is very fast and has small repository size
- Mercurial — revert back to old version and continue from there
255 I'm using Mercurial locally for a project (it's the only repo there's no pushing pulling to from anywhere else) To date it's got a linear history However, the current thing I'm working on I've now realized is a terrible approach and I want to go back to the version before I started it and implement it a different way
- Mercurial: how to amend the last commit? - Stack Overflow
Behind the scenes, Mercurial first commits the update as a regular child of the current parent Then it creates a new commit on the parent's parents with the updated contents Then it changes the working copy parent to this new combined changeset Finally, the old changeset and its update are hidden from 'hg log' (unless you use --hidden with log)
- mercurial - Push creates new remote heads! (did you forget to merge . . .
So first do a: hg pull and then a: hg merge Incidentally the revert you did if you actually used the hg revert command didn't remove those files from history, so your history is probably pretty big Consider reading the first few chapters of the Mercurial book it covers these situations quite well
|
|
|