安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- Cost comparison in todays dollars STS vs. Saturn V - NASASpaceFlight. com
Counting shuttle vs Saturn payload is a little facetious there The Shuttle's payload bay vs a Saturn V is about 1 5 as much, true; but the Shuttle also takes into orbit marginally useful things like a crew compartment and life support systems
- Saturn V VS SLS - Kerbal Space Program Forums
The Falcon 9 could launch atleast 5 times a year for a tiny fraction, for all 5 launches (not reusable), for the same price as 1 SLS launch Just a few things to think about The only thing better about the SLS compared to the Saturn V is its superior payload
- The Best: the SLS, the Saturn V, or the Delta IV Heavy?
"The baseline Saturn MLV would incorporate these changes from the Saturn V vehicle Saturn IC (first stage) stretched 240 inches with 5 6 million pounds propellant and new 5 F-1A engines; S-II (second stage) stretched 41 inches with 1 0 million pounds propellant and 5 J-2 engines; S-IVB (third stage) strengthened, but with standard 230,000 lbs
- Artemis vs Saturn V Liftoff Comparison - SLS, Apollo, Launch, Camera . . .
Multiple camera side-by-side views comparing SLS to Saturn V liftoff Two-night launches are shown: Artemis 1 on October 20, 2021, and Apollo 17 on December 7, 1972 Sequences are presented at approximate real scale, and synchronized visually to the timing of Solid Rocket Booster ignition
- Cost comparison in todays dollars STS vs. Saturn V
A longer, steady production run would have lowered per-launch costs for Saturn IB as well In addition, Saturn IB could have served as a means for NASA to gradually invest in liquid propulsion system improvements A modernized Saturn IB could have been the Ares I that NASA is only now starting to develop
- SLS 1st stage Vs. Saturn V 1st stage. - Science Spaceflight - Kerbal . . .
Now, I have been deciding whether an upgraded Saturn V 1st stage would be better than an SLS 1st stage The info for the stages so you don’t have to look it up SLS:Gross Mass- 979 452 KgDry Mass- 85 270 KgThrust(SL)- 7,440 kNISP Sea Lvl - 363 seconds (Data is for the Block 1 SLS)Saturn V:G
- SLS vs. STS - why is SLS payload capacity lower? - NASASpaceFlight. com
So, according to publicly announced payload capability data the ordering is: SLS Block1, SLS Block1a STS, Saturn V, SLS Block2, Ares V min, Ares V max Even taking into account engine modifications (e g RS-68B, RS-25E, etc ), differences in LEO orbits and speculative nature of Ares configurations - the discrepancies are too big and the
- We Can’t Rebuild Saturn V, But… - forum. nasaspaceflight. com
It would essentially be SLS, but far lower dev costs, lower cost per launch, and 6 cNot just Blue, but just the SpaceX Superheavy booster is more powerful than a Saturn V first stage If NASA wanted to replicate Saturn V, then they could use a Superheavy booster from SpaceX, and upper stages made from BE-3U Blue Origin engines
|
|
|