安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- G. R. No. 254328 - The Lawphil Project
[ G R No 254328 December 02, 2021 ] ANDREW N BAYSA, PETITIONER, VS MARIETTA V SANTOS, RESPONDENT D E C I S I O N LAZARO-JAVIER, J : The Case This petition for review on certiorari seeks to reverse and set aside the following dispositions of the Court of Appeals in CA-G R SP No 149699:
- G. R. No. 254328 - Baysa vs. Santos - jur. ph
Dec 2, 2021 Provincial Adjudicator Baysa, erroneously including Santos' property in a demolition order, faced misconduct charges; SC ruled no bad faith, reversing CA's suspension decision SC reversed the lower court's decisions, dismissing the misconduct complaint against Baysa
- G. R. No. 254328 - ANDREW N. BAYSA, Petitioner, v. MARIETTA V . . .
This petition for review on certiorari seeks to reverse and set aside the following dispositions of the Court of Appeals in CA-G R SP No 149699: (1) Decision 1 dated January 14, 2020 affirming the liability of petitioner Andrew N Baysa (Baysa) for simple misconduct and suspending him for three (3) months without pay; and
- Full Text and Summary of G. R. No. 254328 - Baysa vs. Santos . . .
Read the summary and case digests for Baysa vs Santos in 3 minutes or less and find relevant and cited cases Sign up now to get free credits
- G. R. No. 254328. December 02, 2021 (Case Brief Digest)
G R No 254328 December 02, 2021 (Case Brief Digest) © 2024 - batas org | 1 **Title:** People of the Philippines vs Eugenio Lagarto y Getalado, Jr **Facts:** On May 25, 1983, at around 6:00 PM, Reynaldo Aducal was purchasing fish at the public market in Poblacion, Laoang, Northern Samar At that moment, Eugenio Lagarto y
- Summary: G. R. No. 254328 Baysa v. Santos - legaldex. com
This is a civil case decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on December 2, 2021 The case concerns petitioner Andrew N Baysa, a Provincial Adjudicator of the Office of the Provincial Agrarian Reform Adjudicator, who was found guilty of simple misconduct by the Office of the Ombudsman for ordering the demolition of a building owned by
- Baysa vs. Santos GR 254328 PDF | PDF | Appeal - Scribd
In a 3-sentence decision, the Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's decision, finding that Baysa erred in considering Santos a successor-in-interest when she was never a party to the original case, and that executing the writ of demolition on her property violated her right to due process
|
|
|