安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- One-to-one vs. one-on-one - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
You may use one-to-one when you can identify a source and a destination For eg , a one-to-one email is one sent from a single person to another, i e , no ccs or bccs In maths, a one-to-one mapping maps one element of a set to a unique element in a target set One-on-one is the correct adjective in your example
- Which is correct vs which one is correct? [duplicate]
When using the word "which" is it necessary to still use "one" after asking a question or do "which" and "which one" have the same meaning? Where do you draw the line on the difference between "which" and "which one" when asking a question that involves more than one answer? Example: How much is 1 + 1? Which (one) is the right answer?: A 2 B 11
- Which one is correct: Introduction on or Introduction to or . . .
Introduction of more than one person: Sir, this is Tom, Jerry, and their sister Mary; or should it be "these are"? 0 “survive in a one-on-one battle with one another” or “survive a one-on-one battle with one another”？
- Which one is the correct word, people or peoples?
Which word is correct and what is the difference between these words? People People's I heard somebody say that quot;people's does not work in a sentence People means a group of humans Why wou
- tense - Should I use build or built - English Language Learners . . .
Stack Exchange Network Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers
- 31th or 31st is correct? - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
@onomatomaniak, one hundred oneth is exactly how I've (sometimes) heard it Also, some of those occurrences might be computer-generated: it's much easier to tell a program to tack on a "-th" for all numbers above 3 than to mess around with exceptions or modulo-10 formulas –
- I will or I shall - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
Fowler is wrong in at least one point here It certainly seems true that during some period of time that includes the 19th century, shall was used as the normal auxiliary for first person in RP and probably some other English dialects But I very much doubt that it's been used this way generally in English since early ME
- compounds - Life cycle, life-cycle or lifecycle? - English Language . . .
Should one use one variation when discussing biology, for example, and another when talking about product phases? Wikipedia uses different forms in way that seems random So, too, does the New York Times, based on basic search
|
|
|