安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- Ousia and Hypostasis in the Nicene Creed - Christianity Stack Exchange
While ousia is understood today as "substance," Origen used both terms for the Persons of the Trinity For example: He “used hypostasis and ousia freely as interchangeable terms to describe the Son's distinct reality within the Godhead " (RH, 185) “For Origen the words hypostasis … and ousia are … synonyms for … distinct individual
- Why is ousia translated as substance? Should it be?
Ousia is a noun formed from the present participle ousa of the verb einai ("to be") "Substance" is the traditional translation (note 58, pg 272) (Of course Aristotle has a lot more to say about why the two questions are the same But surely etymology has something to do with his word choice )
- How did Aristotle arrive at the definition of substance ousia?
Finally, there is the argument of 2a 33-2b 6, where Aristotle suggests that a minimal condition on any attempt to identify things worthy of the title prote ousia is that the items so identified constitute the smallest set such that we can truly say of the members of that set, "If none of these things existed, nothing else would either
- What is the difference between person and substance?
The terms ousia (and its synonym physis or “nature”) and hypostasis also appear in the context of Christology The vast majority of Christians believe that Jesus is fully God and fully man; the technical way that Chalcedonian Christians affirm this is to say that Jesus has two natures ( physes )
- nature of god - How do the Father and Son differ if they have the same . . .
The fathers believed that both species (ousia) and persons (hypostases) were substances (nature) in the Aristotelian sense The former refers to the nature that is common to the persons (i e human nature) whilst the latter is the nature that is instantiated in a particular individual (e g human person)
- trinity - Why was homoousios used in the Nicene Creed? - Christianity . . .
The Nicene Creed is the official doctrine of most Christian churches—the Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodox Church, Oriental Orthodox Churches, Church of the East, and Anglican Communion, as well as Lutheran, Reformed, Evangelical, and most mainline Protestant churches—with regard to the ontological status of the three persons or hypostases of the Trinity: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit
- One Essence Three Persons of Trinity [duplicate]
The terms essence (Greek: ousia) and person (Greek: hypostasis) are simply ways of expressing what the O P has stated in more technical, philosophical language The simplest way of looking at it is as follows: ousía means (according to Aristotle’s famous definition) “what a thing is simply because it is” (in Greek: to ti en einai ; this
- Why was homoousios not mentioned for 20 years after Nicaea?
The Homo-ians, who remained the dominant emperor-supported faction, rejected all use of ousia-terms They held that Jesus Christ is like the Father, without reference to ousia (essence or substance) Conclusions When the Nicene Creed was formulated, the term homoousios was not regarded as important
|
|
|