安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- united states - Does the US President have authority to rename a . . .
In his 2nd inaugural address, Donald Trump said that among his first actions he intends to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, and Denali back to Mt McKinley Since Denali is in the U
- united states - What would happen if a US circuit court consistently . . .
What incentives prevent this from happening right now? As I understand it, most lower court decisions treat Supreme Court precedent, especially recent precedent, as inarguable truth, forming the axiomatic basis of the lower court's decisions
- What makes the Nuclear Option in the US Senate a precedent that its . . .
The precedent becomes part of the rules of the Senate Now suppose in future there is a cloture vote on an appointment, and it passes 52-48 (say) If the chair rules that this isn't enough there would be a point of order and the 52 votes would again overrule the chair
- Why doesnt Russia recognize Kosovo if it uses the Kosovo precedent to . . .
The Declaration of Independence of the Republic of Crimea written in 2014 explicitly mentions Kosovo as a precedent for unilateral declarations of independence This declaration of independence was
- Is there some historical precedent to charge port fees based on who . . .
The BBC mentions that there is potential logistical chaos on the cards from a little-noticed multi-million dollar port tax for every cargo vessel docking in the US that was quot;made in China quo
- What is the Constitutional precedent for military aid?
Is there any Constitutional precedent for the claim that it is or is not within the rights or duties of the office of the President of the United States or of Congress to grant, to deny, or to susp
- Have POTUS pardons before 2025 included wording that they are not . . .
First of all, if it is "dicta" rather than a holding of an issue actually before it, the precedent isn't binding What often happens is that decisions are decided inconsistently with the hold precedent and affirmed without expressly overruling a new case This is called implicitly overruling a case And, often what happens is that a legal theory develops in later precedents that doesn't
- united states - Is there precedent for a losing candidate to be . . .
Is there any precedent since 1913 1 for a Senate candidate who lost, to be appointed to the Senate shortly 2 after the election? 1 The Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified which established the direct election of senators, as well as means of filling vacant Senate seats
|
|
|