安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- united states - What would happen if a US circuit court consistently . . .
What incentives prevent this from happening right now? As I understand it, most lower court decisions treat Supreme Court precedent, especially recent precedent, as inarguable truth, forming the axiomatic basis of the lower court's decisions
- united states - Does the US President have authority to rename a . . .
In his 2nd inaugural address, Donald Trump said that among his first actions he intends to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, and Denali back to Mt McKinley Since Denali is in the U
- united states - Has the US Supreme court ever altered its own precedent . . .
The existing precedent had been defined according to viability since Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992), a modification of the "trimester framework" set at Roe v
- united states - Can the VP technically take over the Senate by ignoring . . .
Without that precedent in place, all Senators are effectively equal This technically works because the VP as the President of the Senate is a Constitutional power Once the VP is in charge, they could recognize anyone they wanted The catch here is you would merely override the Majority Leader's power to block floor votes
- united states - Were tariffs under section 122 imposed by some . . .
Trump quickly responded to the Supreme Court striking down his IEEPA tariffs by announcing 'additional' 10% global tariffs under section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act It's unclear to me though if this
- Precedent for a sitting President not residing in the White House?
Was there ever any precedent set, for a sitting President of the United States to not have resided in the White House during the entirety or parts of his tenure ?
- united kingdom - What is the precedent for replacing the British Prime . . .
What is the precedent for replacing the British Prime Minster without a general election and what are the constitutional rules? Ask Question Asked 6 years, 10 months ago Modified 6 years, 9 months ago
- united states - If two U. S. Constitutional amendments conflict with . . .
@JamesK: Precedent must be examined when trying to resolve situations which are not adequately addressed by any other existing law, but its legitimate authority is limited to such cases If the Supreme Court issues a ruling which would be grossly and patently inconsistent with any remotely plausible reading of the Constitution and other laws, those sworn by oath to uphold the Constitution
|
|
|