安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- Harris v. Quinn, 573 U. S. 616 (2014) - Justia U. S. Supreme Court Center
Harris v Quinn: The First Amendment of the U S Constitution prohibits a state from compelling home health care providers who are not "full-fledged public employees" to pay union dues to a union they do not wish to join
- Harris v. Quinn - Wikipedia
Harris v Quinn, 573 U S 616 (2014), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court regarding provisions of Illinois state law that allowed a union security agreement
- Argument recap: Public employee unionism under fire
The case of Harris v Quinn would only spell doom for government workers’ collective action, it appeared, if Justice Antonin Scalia could be persuaded to join in doing it in; there just might be enough other votes This seemed an unlikely case to even raise that issue, but raise it, it surely did
- Harris v. Quinn | Oyez
In 2010, Harris and other personal assistants from both programs sued Governor Pat Quinn and the unions and claimed that the fair share fees violated their freedom of speech and freedom of association rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments
- Harris v. Quinn | Supreme Court Bulletin | US Law | LII Legal . . .
Now, in Harris v Quinn , the Supreme Court will consider whether its holding in Abood extends to in-home caregivers operating under Illinois’s Medicaid-waiver programs
- Harris v. Quinn (2014) | The First Amendment Encyclopedia
In Harris v Quinn (2014), the Supreme Court dealt with the First Amendment issues of requiring personal care workers in Illinois to join a union against their will
- Harris v. Quinn - Federalist Society
In 2010, Harris and other personal assistants from both programs sued Governor Pat Quinn and the unions and claimed that the fair share fees violated their freedom of speech and freedom of association rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments
- Harris v. Quinn | Definition, History, Facts | Britannica
Quinn, legal case in which the U S Supreme Court, on June 30, 2014, held (5–4) that workers who are paid by the state of Illinois to provide in-home personal assistance to adults cannot be required to pay service fees to a union to help fund its collective-bargaining activities on their behalf
|
|
|