安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
安裝中文字典英文字典辭典工具!
|
- Creasy v. Tincher :: 1970 :: Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia . . .
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Putnam County in an action instituted by the plaintiff, Erma G Creasy, against the defendants, Lyle E Tincher, Vesta S Tincher and Burgess Realty, Inc , to compel specific performance of a real estate purchase agreement entered into between her as purchaser and the Tinchers as the
- 03 31 70 ERMA G. CREASY v. LYLE E. TINCHER - AnyLaw
Research the case of 03 31 70 ERMA G CREASY v LYLE E TINCHER, from the West Virginia Supreme Court, 03-31-1970 AnyLaw is the Friendly legal research service that gives you unlimited access to massive amounts of valuable legal data
- 5 The Tinchers signed a contract to sell land to Creasy The contract . . .
[Creasy v Tincher, 173 S E 2d 332 (W Va )] The contract was terminated because the contract did state the time that it had to be completed whether or not it said time was of the essence and the contract specified that the sales transaction was to be completed in 90 days
- Chapter 18 Discharge of Contracts Flashcards - Quizlet
The Tinchers sell land to Creasy The Contract specified that the sale must be completed in 90 days Creasy requested an extension of time but Tinchers refused and stated that the contract was terminated
- 03 31 70 ERMA G. CREASY v. LYLE E. TINCHER - api. anylaw. com
As a result of his examination Mrs Creasy was advised that one half of the minerals under one of the tracts had been acquired by the Tinchers by a tax deed and that some corrective action should be taken to clear any cloud that might be created by such deed
- Creasy v. Tincher, 173 S. E. 2d 332 (W. Va. 1970) - CourtListener
Table of Authorities for Creasy v Tincher, 173 S E 2d 332, 154 W Va 18, 1970 W Va LEXIS 173 1 reference to W D Nelson Co v Taylor Heights Development Corp , 150 S E 2d 142 (Va 1966) Supreme Court of Virginia Sept 9, 1966 Also cited by 13 opinions; Newsletter Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and
- The Tinchers signed a contract to sell land to Creasy. The contract . . .
The contract between the Tinchers and Creasy specified that the sales transaction was to be completed in 90 days This means that both parties agreed to a specific time frame for completing the transaction Show more…
- Creasy v. Tincher – CourtListener. com
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Putnam County in an action instituted by the plaintiff, Erma G Creasy, against the defendants, Lyle E Tincher, Vesta S Tincher and Burgess Realty, Inc , to compel specific performance of a real estate purchase agreement entered into between her as purchaser and the Tinchers as the
|
|
|