What can I assume if a publicly published project has no license? There is some code on GitHub that I would like to use The repository has no public declaration of license that I can find But this particular project has over 200 forks and is a pretty active his
GitHub Stars is a very useful metric. But for *what*? GitHub Stars may be "juiced" by media attention, which is temporary and not actually based on sustained popularity This is from personal experience -- after publicizing a fork of an my open source repo on Hacker News, I received some stars, but no corresponding increase in use of my fork
Supporting Regulatory Compliance with Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 First published on TechNet on Aug 20, 2007 [Today's post comes to us courtesy of James Frederickson] We are noticing an increased number of calls where Organizations—particularly those in the financial and healthcare industries—are required by such regulations as SEC Rule 17A- 4 and the Healthcare Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) to archive and control access to
Ingestion, ETL, and Stream Processing with Azure Databricks | Microsoft . . . After the raw data has been ingested to the Bronze layer, companies perform additional ETL and stream processing tasks to filter, clean, transform, join, and aggregate the data into more curated Silver and Gold datasets Using Azure Databricks as the foundational service for these processing tasks provides companies with a single, consistent compute engine (the Delta Engine) built on open
github - Structuring C libraries - Open Source Stack Exchange In the past years, I wrote much C source code, parts of which might also be useful to others So I would like to restructure this code in a way such that it makes sense to publish it on Github and