Prerequisite for vs. prerequisite to - English Language Usage . . . According to Humboldt (Aksan, 1998), language is a prerequisite to the materialization of thought The prerequisites of these procedures are the reader's actual and fictional encyclopedias -- they are individually differentiated
grammaticality - Pre-requisite vs prerequisite - English Language . . . In short, prefixes with a hypen, e g "pre-" should be avoided unless it will not be clear to the reader what the word is This is even more the case if there is an existing word so, in your case, "pre-requisite" should not be used Interconnection -- not Inter-connection; Pre-workout -- not Preworkout Prerequisite -- not Pre-requisite Multitask -- not Multi-task Polymath -- not Poly-math
Under what circumstances should I use requisite and required? Thanks for the detailed and useful answer (+1) However, I'm not entirely swayed by the argument that 'required' should be used becuase it is used more often Does this mean that: 1 The are completely interchangeable, or 2 There are circumstances contexts where it is more appropriate to use 'Requisite' If the latter is true, what are these circumstances contexts?
phrase requests - English Language Usage Stack Exchange @mplungjan I did find that question, but I'm not really looking in a software feature context, so "optional requirements" definitely sounds oxymoronic without being relevant jargon Ditto "out of scopes" Nice-to-have works, but well, it doesn't sound so good, hence I was wondering if there was a better word phrase around
Can one meet criteria, or satisfy requirements? I usually see 'satisfy the criteria' and 'meet the requirements', but is it acceptable to use 'meet the criteria', or 'satisfy the requirements'?