What is the difference between __str__ and __repr__? return f"{self __class__!s}({self __dict__!r})" would have been too dangerous (for example, too easy to get into infinite recursion if objects reference each other) So Python cops out Note that there is one default which is true: if __repr__ is defined, and __str__ is not, the object will behave as though __str__=__repr__ This means, in simple terms: almost every object you implement should
What does !r do in str () and repr ()? - Stack Overflow If anyone, after reading those 2 answers here, is still wondering what to use !r or repr for, I'd like to shed some light on my own observation of our huge corporate shared library: After scanning the usage of !r and repr in fstrings, I FOUND that 50% are with repr and 50% are with !r After looking at the blame on git, I found that people with !r contribution are somehow more passionate about
funções - Afinal para que serve a função repr no python? - Stack . . . 5 O repr chama o método interno __repr__ do objeto A ideia dele é retornar uma representação como string de qualquer objeto - mas pensando antes no programador do que no usuário final do programa Sobretudo é o repr que é chamado para cada resultado de expressão quando usamos o Python no modo interativo
The difference between __str__ and __repr__? - Stack Overflow __str__ and __repr__ are both methods for getting a string representation of an object __str__ is supposed to be shorter and more user-friendly, while __repr__ is supposed to provide more detail Specifically, for many data types, __repr__ returns a string that, if you pasted it back into Python, would be a valid expression whose value would be equal to the original value For instance, str