rle compression algorithm c - Stack Overflow RLE can be done in one pass, there should not be a need to seek to the previous characters One way to solve this is to change the logic into looking at the previous characters and how many times they have been repeated, instead of trying to look ahead at future characters
math - Binary run length encoding - Stack Overflow Since you're coding bits, you probably want to use a bit-based RLE instead of a byte-based one In this context, you should consider Elias gamma coding (or some variant thereof) to efficiently encode your run lengths A reasonable first approximation for your encoding format might be:
python - RLE compression algorithm - Stack Overflow You haven't described the format of the compressed text adequately—so I guessed by looking at your code and comparing it to related implementations I found searching the web
How to decode a COCO RLE binary mask to an image in javascript? Decode RLE into binary mask (2d matrix or flattened) and then paint pixels according to that mask; Draw mask directly from RLE string on a virtual canvas and then rotate it by 90deg and flip horizontally; Here's the example of both:
compression - RLE Encoding bit sequence, not bytes - Stack Overflow I'm finding for an implementation that, starting from a sequence of bytes, applies the RLE encoding over the bit-sequence corresponding to the input (0 and 1) Note that also another algorithm can work (I need a compression ratio <0 9, so I think any algorithm can do it), but the implementation need to work on a bit-basis, not bytes
r - Use rle to group by runs when using dplyr - Stack Overflow What is causing my rle-based grouping code to fail in dplyr, and is there any solution that enables me to keep using rle when grouping by run id? Update: As of 2023, this appears to have been fixed by the dplyr package, such that my original code works fine, and there's no need for any workarounds
algorithm - Finding the minimum length RLE - Stack Overflow The classical RLE algorithm compresses data by using numbers to represent how many times the character following a number appears in the text at that position For example: AAABBAAABBCECE => 3A2B3A2B1C1E1C1E However, in the above example, that method results in even more space being used by the compressed text
Encoding numbers in RLE Compression - Stack Overflow On this version I only insert characters count in the RLE Code if it's more than 1, other than that I keep it as its original state The problem I encounter here when trying to encode numbers in the original input text Is there any way to encode them like alphabet characters without losing efficiency of the RLE compression ratio Example