Why is the controversy of the fourth century called the Arian . . . Apparently, the terms “Arian,” “Arianism,” and “Arian Controversy” were derived from the name of Arius, who was in charge of one of the churches in Alexandria, and whose dispute with his bishop Alexander began the Arian Controversy This implies that Arius was a very important person
What do we know about Arian liturgy? - Christianity Stack Exchange The creed of Arian Ulfilas (c 311 – 383), which concludes a letter praising him written by Auxentius, distinguishes God the Father ("unbegotten"), who is the only true God from Son of God ("only-begotten"), who is Lord Master; and the Holy Spirit (the illuminating and sanctifying power), who is neither God nor Lord Master:
Subordination was orthodox when the Arian Controversy began. The ‘Arian’ Controversy raged for most of the fourth century In the traditional account, today’s Trinity doctrine was accepted orthodoxy when the Controversy began but Arius introduced a novel heresy that dominated the church for over 50 years
heresy - What is the current relevance of Arianism? - Christianity . . . That is not in with the historic Arian doctrine Some sects like Unitarianism, Mormonism (Latter Day Saint movement), Iglesia ni Cristo etc , hold a form of Arianism, but they all differ with each other and with traditional Arianism in many doctrinal issues No remnant of any of the Arian sects established in early days is known to exist today
biblical basis - What Scriptures did Arius use to support teaching that . . . One prominent Arian in Arius’ day (Asterius) explained that “when God desired that created nature should come into existence, he saw that nature could not endure his direct hand and so 'he initially makes and created, himself sole, a sole Being, and calls this Son and Word'; consequently, once this mediating Being had come into existence
Why was Theodosius successful in ending the Arian Controversy? In the conventional account of the Arian controversy, the council of Constantinople in the year 381 made an end of that controversy In reality, the controversy was brought to an end by Emperor Theodosius in the year 380 through the Edict of Thessalonica , in which he outlawed all forms of Christianity that do not profess the Trinity doctrine
What are the similarities and differences between Origen and Arius . . . “Many scholars have regarded Arian ideas in a vague and wholesale way as an inheritance from Origen's doctrine” (Hanson, p 62) This article compares Arius' theology to Origen's, showing the similarities and differences This, therefore, also serves as a summary of their theologies Similarities Arius agreed with Origen on the following:
What was the core issue in the Arian Controversy? Following the last full-scale book on the Arian Controversy, published in English by Gwatkin at the beginning of the 20th century, R P C Hanson in 1988 published perhaps the most influential book in modern history on the Arian Controversy (Hanson RPC, The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy, 318-381 1988)
church history - Was Constantine The Great a Nicene Christian . . . Lately I've been trying to figure out whether or not Constantine is a Nicene Christian He was baptised by Eusebius who was of course an Arian And since he was very close to Eusebius, he was influenced by Arian views (exiling Saint Athanasius) Some sources I have looked at say that he favored Arianism instead of the Orthodox christian view