Can we use the verb hath in modern English? [closed] No Hath is archaic and is not used in current spoken or written English, unless you are deliberately trying to sound very old-fashioned (as in, 400 years out-of-date)
What is a good example of a subcontext? - English Language Learners . . . He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept Ambition should be made of sterner stuff Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a
a Monday and Mondays - English Language Learners Stack Exchange "Is football practice on a Monday?" This sounds perfectly normal to me The speaker is asking whether a class, a training session etc is held on a specific day of the week When a class occurs on the same day of the week, every week, we can make the noun plural We have English (lessons) on Tuesdays and Thursdays UPDATE Some holidays are celebrated on a specific day of the week every year
change into and change to for changing file name I read this post: I'm wondering about the difference between "change into" and "change to" but I still don't get the rule in case of "changing name of file" or in
grammaticality - Have never been vs never was - English Language . . . Agreeing with the other answer, here I would say that either convey what you're trying to say However, in this case "never have been" may be more accurate because you're saying that you still have potential to become a good cook in the future On the other hand, the word "was" is typically used to describe something that will not change So, "I never was a nice child" as opposed to "I never